![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,492
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,492
|
![]()
Topkapı Palace Museum.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 803
|
![]()
Eric,
It could very well be that the above arms with miquelet type locks could have been converted from matchlock. It would really take very little effort, and with a new panel of decoration where the serpentine came through the stock, would not really show at all. Another thing I am thinking about, is the Omani matchlocks we see with very fine early barrels, (17th C and a bit later) We know these were not made in Oman, so, were they re-purposed Ottoman or Persian barrels, salvaged and re-used in later years? I believe these barrels were Persian, but if so, Did Ottoman recycled arms meet the same fate? (Of being stripped down & barrels sent to another country for re-use? (Could explain the lack of original Ottoman examples.....) What thinkest thou? Richard. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,492
|
![]() Quote:
This image supposedly shows how those beautiful barrels were produced. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 803
|
![]()
Eric,
Yes, this is the later "Damascus" style twist. The earlier types were a stub -iron twist, as shown below; Richard. Manouchehr M. has some wonderful photos of Persian arms in his book when published, and some very nice photos in his series on Persian arms in Classic Arms Magazine. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,492
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 803
|
![]()
Not wrong Eric,
These are beautiful examples of what we in the west would call a stub twist. (stub twist, as the preferred material was old iron horseshoe nail stubs) I have a few old guns with "Twisted stubs" or "Stub twist" stamped on the under-side. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,145
|
![]() Quote:
Kubur |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,492
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 803
|
![]()
I think the miquelet started out as a matchlock nearly for sure, with the very similar styling.
There is no reason for a miquelet stock to angle behind the breech as does this example, (and the others above) The only thing to cause this, is fashion of former arms, (matchlock) Or,....conversion from said matchlock. Do nice old matchlock barrels turn up in other places besides Oman? (apart from a few in India that are not the usual Indian/Indo /Persian work) Richard. Edited to say these are probably the nicest Ottoman barrels I have ever seen. Thanks for posting them. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,492
|
![]() Quote:
Richard, I have to give the Museumslandschaft Hessen Kassel credit for posting these high resolution photographs from their collection. They have eleven Ottoman examples with three being matchlocks. Here are top views of all eleven for comparison. These guns never turned up in a goofle search due to being described as Luntenschlossgewehr and Schnapphahngewehr. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chania Crete Greece
Posts: 511
|
![]()
The first one looks a bit ottoman in design, what do you think? (the one with the goat hairy skin). The other looks like re-stocked ottoman barel?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|