![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 415
|
![]() Quote:
Remember also that Muslims are forbidden to decorate with representational images (e.g., faces). =Kubar And the filigree work looks very different from the filigree work posted by Oriental Arms. The Tuza is a unique type of filigree. See sources cited earlier. =Kubar The stamp at the back is a silver proof? Do they still use this silver proof in Yemen? According to the resources I have (see links to documents to download elsewhere in this thread), artisans were forbidden in Yemen to sign their work in any manner after 1920. I have not had this item tested for metallurgy. Thanks for the questions. Best, Dave A. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: CHRISTCHURCH NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 2,786
|
![]() Quote:
Regarding the "proof" stamp. Have a look under the backing leather if you can. I suspect that the "stamp" is in fact a separate piece of metal/silver. IF this was a makers STAMP then it would be just that....a stamp into the metal of the scabbard, and not attached later. (See example below) I have never heard of silver proofing in Yemen, but that is not to say that it did not happen. Regards Stu |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,145
|
![]() Quote:
Ottomans controled Yemen, it could be Silver proof... ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,145
|
![]() Quote:
Thank you for all these informations, I feel less stupid now! Only one point is wrong. Muslims are forbiden to represent humans or animals in the moques. Islamic art is full of human figures. So it's not a point that we can link to Jews. Regards, Kubur |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|