![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Buraimi Oman, on the border with the UAE
Posts: 4,408
|
![]()
Nice Scales... Often the Othmanli (Ottoman) scales have the Tugra of the Ottoman Empire stamped on them... The date of possibly 1795/1745 ??? is plausible.
Please note http://kurkman.com/images/Armenianobserver.jpg where by following the last papagraph a lead may be obtained in this interesting field.. ![]() SEE http://maviboncuk.blogspot.com/2008/...nd-scales.html Last edited by Ibrahiim al Balooshi; 23rd September 2015 at 08:41 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
Thank you Ibrahiim.
Having bought this in a local flea market, i would hardly assume that this example is not Portuguese. Yes, the date must be around that; i just don't see a similar type of writing font out there. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Buraimi Oman, on the border with the UAE
Posts: 4,408
|
![]()
I agree ...Not Ottoman ...Portuguese; I think so.
The Ottomans were absolute sticklers for accurate scale measurements and had all scales stamped with the official Tughra as in this one below...and a set of scales with a similar stamp... Last edited by Ibrahiim al Balooshi; 24th September 2015 at 10:28 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
If scales are used with weights, those are in more need to be certified. I observe that, over here, we had the King's crest punched in weights, that were applied by the official of the Royal checking office.
I have this (rather) rustic weight, i think for flax weighing, originally forged in 1818, as may be read. Then at a later stage (1831?), either because weight standards criteria was altered or its mass was tampered with (the usual ancient cheating trick), its owner had to add some more iron to it, for a new certification. In the first issue you may see the King's crest (Dom Joćo VI). In the second check up, the mark is not so clear. . |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|