Catalogue of my collection

[nechesh]

Originally Posted by Mans

About the Acid Bath (Warangan), it is an a part of the whole on the Keris Cultures. To give the warangan, we must do some phase from Mutih/Methak, nyelup 'till give it the keris oil. It is a very difficult activities and complicated too. We must know well about the characteristic of the iron and pamor material and when we should take away the keris from Warangan in order to get the optimal output. So that why just a few people can and wish to do it.

Hi Mans. I'm not sure if you misunderstood me or if you just wanted to add the above information. I wasn't implying that the examples in Jensen's book would not have received warangan treatment, but since they have been in museum collections since the 1600s they did not while the Javanese blades you show from the same era were washed over centuries with much blade erosion. Hard to compare physical attributions between them comsidering. It is also my understanding that Javanese blades were once polished in the manner that we gererally see Balinese blades. This makes comparison even more difficult since these Jensen examples appear to have such a polished finish while your examples have the rough etched finish that has become the custon in Jawa as well as other islands.
Having spent the last few years working on my skills with warangan i can attest first hand to the difficulties of blade staining. I have had to stain some s few times before getting them "right" and still have a few i've done that need reworking. But when you get it right it is very satisfying.

[BluErf]

I think it is wholly possible that different regions of Java had different styles of kerises at the same time. Java is a big place and can hold many courts, many kingdoms at the same time, and I believe at least a couple of them did co-exist in different parts of Java at the some time. The kerises in Jensen's book were, I believe, collected in the coastal areas (Pasisir), which could have keris styles similar to the Balinese courts - big robust blade with prominent ricikan. The kerises in the other areas could have been like what Mans have been posting - relatively petite blades with wide sor-soran and narrow middles and tips. I've seen these in some keris books as been attributed to 16-17th century too.

[Mans]

Originally Posted by nechesh

Hi Mans. I'm not sure if you misunderstood me or if you just wanted to add the above information.

I mean, I just need to add informations that if we need to learn about the Javanese keris, we must indentifying and know when the keris came not or with warangan, because warangan process is a part of the whole the keris culture at Jawa. Rough or smooth condition also shown where the keris from. For example, if keris from Majapahit and Sedayu era, it must be smooth although it give Warangan. But if the keris from Madura Pamekasan, Cirebon, or Pajajaran, usually more rough. So, the conditions of the blade shown the technique of iron and pamor work, then we can distinguishing each keris from period and regional. The conditions of the blade is just 1 from many aspects to analysing the keris