Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 14th June 2015, 11:56 PM   #1
rickystl
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: St. Louis, MO area.
Posts: 1,630
Default

SOME MORE PICS.........
Attached Images
      
rickystl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th June 2015, 11:58 PM   #2
rickystl
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: St. Louis, MO area.
Posts: 1,630
Default

STILL MORE.......
Attached Images
    
rickystl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th June 2015, 07:10 AM   #3
Kubur
Member
 
Kubur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,145
Default

Hi Rick,
I can read 1276 that is 1859 in Gregorian calendar.
I would like to see the Arabic inscription with it... It's a very good gun!!
Congratulations.
Kubur
Kubur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th June 2015, 07:36 PM   #4
Kubur
Member
 
Kubur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,145
Default

For me, your triggerguard is maybe from Spanish origin, but original to the making of your pistol and not added later. Possibly from a Spanish riffle, it's common with Moroccan pistols. Despite the fact that the "classical" Moroccan triggerguard is very rounded, almost circular and very close to the trigger.
Netherlands were Spanish territories from 1556 to 1714. Snaphaunce, miquelet or Ripoll were common in Holland and Spain. As you know, they influenced the Moroccan weaponery as Morocco was outside the Ottoman sphere... But I' sure that all the members know that better than me.
Kubur
Attached Images
   
Kubur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2015, 04:34 PM   #5
rickystl
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: St. Louis, MO area.
Posts: 1,630
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kubur
Hi Rick,
I can read 1276 that is 1859 in Gregorian calendar.
I would like to see the Arabic inscription with it... It's a very good gun!!
Congratulations.
Kubur
Hi Kubur.
How observant of you! 1276 (1859). I can't believe I didn't notice this till you mentioned it. Getting old I guess. Thank you soooo much. Here are better pics of both side of the grip. The other side looks like an Arabic inscription (?) May someone can make it out? Again, thanks for the notice!!!
Rick.
Attached Images
  
rickystl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2015, 05:17 PM   #6
rickystl
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: St. Louis, MO area.
Posts: 1,630
Default

For me, your triggerguard is maybe from Spanish origin, but original to the making of your pistol and not added later. Possibly from a Spanish riffle, it's common with Moroccan pistols. Despite the fact that the "classical" Moroccan triggerguard is very rounded, almost circular and very close to the trigger.
Netherlands were Spanish territories from 1556 to 1714. Snaphaunce, miquelet or Ripoll were common in Holland and Spain. As you know, they influenced the Moroccan weaponery as Morocco was outside the Ottoman sphere... But I' sure that all the members know that better than me.
Kubur

Thanks for your comments. Yes, the only trigger guards I recall seeing is the classical circular ones you mention, and in the other Thread you posted.
And yes, the butt stock does somewhat look like it was maybe influenced by the Spanish Ripoll style grip. But also notice that it was made without ANY provision for a ramrod, real or false - ala Caucassion style. The pistol is definately Moroccan. But it's the only one I've ever seen with this combination of styling. And it's very well made. Guess that's why I had to have it. LOL

TRIGGER GUARD: See pics below. There was never any provision to secure the rear of the trigger guard to the stock. You can freely move it side to side. I don't believe any gunsmith would have left the guard unsecured like that. Would be too easy to get caught/twisted in a belt/sash. There is a perfectly square cut out that the front of the guard sits in and secured with a nail. The half-round shape of the guard does not match the square cut out where it sits. That's why I think the trigger guard was a later addition. Maybe the square cut out held another inlay or stone? I can also tell the rear of the trigger guard had been shortened and filed smooth. So to me, the trigger guard is still a mystery.
Rick.
Attached Images
   
rickystl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2015, 10:12 PM   #7
kahnjar1
Member
 
kahnjar1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: CHRISTCHURCH NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 2,786
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rickystl
Hi Kubur.
How observant of you! 1276 (1859). I can't believe I didn't notice this till you mentioned it. Getting old I guess. Thank you soooo much. Here are better pics of both side of the grip. The other side looks like an Arabic inscription (?) May someone can make it out? Again, thanks for the notice!!!
Rick.
Not to throw cold water on the dating, but usually any date on an Arabic item is in ARABIC numerals. Also 1276 "C" would IMHO be rather unusual as the dating would be from the HIJRA calendar.
Stu
kahnjar1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2015, 11:14 PM   #8
Kubur
Member
 
Kubur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,145
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kahnjar1
Not to throw cold water on the dating, but usually any date on an Arabic item is in ARABIC numerals. Also 1276 "C" would IMHO be rather unusual as the dating would be from the HIJRA calendar.
Stu
Dear Stu,
Not always. They used also our numeral (Arabic), the Arabs use the Indian one (known as Arabic). Our system but with the hirji calendar. I'm sure of the dating! I can post other examples on Moroccan powder flasks. Best,
Kubur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2015, 11:23 PM   #9
kahnjar1
Member
 
kahnjar1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: CHRISTCHURCH NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 2,786
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kubur
Dear Stu,
Not always. They used also our numeral (Arabic), the Arabs use the Indian one (known as Arabic). Our system but with the hirji calendar. I'm sure of the dating! I can post other examples on Moroccan powder flasks. Best,
My point was more related to the letter "C" after the date, rather than the date itself.
kahnjar1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.