![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 462
|
![]() Quote:
Although it lacks a piece of the handle It is very heavy 850 grams |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,193
|
![]()
Interesting comments, and I think the term best describing these is probably 'unique', as while they typically are remarkably similar in their overall appearance, they are often deeply nuanced in many of the shapes, sizes and decorative devices .
Whenever I see a flyssa, quite honestly the first thing in my mind is Emanuel!! I think this man has studied these fascinating weapons far more than anyone else I have ever known. We've had great discussions here on these over many years. The thing on flyssa is that they are actually a kind of traditional icon among these Berber tribes in these Algerian regions, and as I have understood serve as a kind of 'rite of passage' for young men. While the traditional motif of linear fibular triangles and other characteristic features seem to prevail in most cases, there are singular devices as seen here which seem to be more custom designed for individuals or perhaps groups. Indeed these are not 'heraldic' but I believe amuletic and in accord with the context of the traditional motif which is also talismanic. While most of the tribes of the Iflyssen groups remained independent of the Ottoman rulers, they were deeply influenced by their weapons, and while the young men highly favored the yataghans, it seems that these 'unique' and now indigenous 'flyssa' were developed as local versions influenced by the earlier forms of yataghan. The possibly earlier example flyssa linked by Emanuel is most interesting, and the linear motif along the back of the blade seems to relate perhaps to the Byzantine type motifs often seen in these cultures. It has been extremely difficult to establish chronology and origins of the flyssa, and as Emanuel has pointed out some time ago, they were in dramatic decline by the latter years of the 19th c. I think the first recorded use of the word 'flyssa' was around 1827, and the earliest 'provenanced' example I have ever found was captured by the French Foreign Legion c. 1857 (?). Thank you for sharing this very sturdy looking example Weapons27, and I hope there will be more discussion on these interesting swords here. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,242
|
![]()
Thank you for your kind words Jim
![]() I have you to thank for setting me on the flyssa path years ago ![]() What's interesting about these thicker, shorter ones is that they've been popping up more often over the last few years. Perhaps because more people recognize them as flyssa, don't know. Weapons27, some of these never had brass covering, as you can see by the missing tacks that would hold the brass sheets on the handle. You can really see the construction of the handle and the thick integral bolster / thin tang assembly. This kind of handle construction is weird. Regards, Emanuel |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
Here is mine: deeply incised blade and wooden handle.
Obviously stems fom ottoman yataghans, and eerily reminiscent of the earliest ones, belonging to BayezidII, Selim I and Suleiman the Magnificient. Last edited by ariel; 17th June 2015 at 11:11 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|