Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 18th April 2015, 09:23 PM   #1
kahnjar1
Member
 
kahnjar1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: CHRISTCHURCH NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 2,786
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rickystl
To answer a question posted above about the two open holes in the barrel tang. This is another curious mystery. There are no threads in the two holes. And, there are no holes beneath the tang in the stock where wood screws or nails would have been. So the only thing holding the barrel to the stock are the multiple barrel bands, which do hold it firmly in place. My guess is that the were originally screws/nails used when the barrel was originally utilized as a matchlock. So the barrel was re-used while making the current stock and flintlock configuration.
I do have some original dome head wood screws that are over 125 years old that I thought about using. Rick.
Hi Rick,
Nice job of restoration but like others above, I believe that there is a limit IMHO as to how far one should go. There is a fine line between restoration and rebuild. As an example I once saw what had been a nice original Sharps rifle totally ruined by "restoration". The owner had gone so far, that all marks etc had been removed, and he had ended up with nothing more than a shiny replica.
Anyway....back to those holes....I would not expect that they were threaded, but what I think is that there would at some stage have been screws which threaded into the trigger plate.....ie they would have gone right thru the original stock, which may not have been the one which is there now.
Stu

Last edited by kahnjar1; 19th April 2015 at 04:56 AM.
kahnjar1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th April 2015, 06:09 PM   #2
rickystl
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: St. Louis, MO area.
Posts: 1,630
Default

Hi Stu.
Yes, this gun is closer to a re-build than restoration. But the original goal of this Jazail was to have a shooter versus a collector piece. And since I was so intent on having a shooter, I thought this example was a good candidate for the project.
That said, I totally agree with you on over-restoration. And the Sharps rifle you mentioned is a textbook example of what NOT to do. I own an original Northwest Trade Fusil, converted to percussion, that is in attic condition. It was probably used all the way up till the tumbler broke. Of course, these guns are rare in any condition, and I would not dream of doing any restoration to it. Not even fixing the lock. I simply give it an occasional light soap cleaning and keep it for display in my collection. I'm simply the next caretaker for her.
As far as the holes in the barrel tang. You could be right about that. But we will never know for sure. The barrel was used in a matchlock, then re-used to build another gun back in the period. But all the Jazails I've seen have either a small trigger plate or no no trigger plate. Which leads me to believe wood screws or nails were more likely. I've seen both used. In fact, my other Jazail has two square headed nails.
Thanks for your interest. Rick. I'll post another gun sometime today.
rickystl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th April 2015, 10:08 PM   #3
rickystl
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: St. Louis, MO area.
Posts: 1,630
Default

Just a couple of pics......
Attached Images
  
rickystl is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.