![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greenville, NC
Posts: 1,854
|
Absolutely gorgeous piece!! I am wondering if the chape was perhaps recarved later, perhaps after damage. It is so ornate and delicate it is not practical or typical of chapes seen on most Indo-Malay pieces. The age certainly seems to match with the scabbard mouth though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,637
|
Very nice find Carlos!
I suspect that this is a presentation pedang - Sote is one of the names (disclaimer - not being Balinese speaking I am not sure how to use it). As explained to me those where used at "political and court meetings" similar to European dress swords. Maybe that's the reason for the unpractical chape (according to Charles)? I have one myself and also assumed it was Lombok. But the Seller, who is regulary visiting Indonesia and also very acquinted with the culture, insisted that mine was Bali (even after I payed for it!). And mine even has a redpainted scabbard which I usually connect to Lombok. Michael |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 940
|
Michael, the styles and traditions of Bali and Lombok are just about Identical. I think it would be VERY difficult, without provenence, to judge which precise origin this blade has. Lombok was ruled by the Balinese court for many years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,637
|
Nechesh,
I forgot to mention that the seller had bought it directly from the family of the previous owner (on the provenance). Yes, it's difficult to separate Bali and Lombok weapons so I always try to doublecheck. As you know even if it was bought in f.i. Bali it could still be Lombok vice versa. That happened to me 11 years ago in Lombok. Michael |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|