![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,280
|
![]()
I hear you Alan, I hear you......
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,214
|
![]()
Why I collect is difficult to say, I've collect already when I was a very young boy. I have collect nearly all what appealed my eyes or what I find interesting, stamps, coins, papermoney, paperweights (hi Alan
![]() Of course I like high end pieces but my limited financial situation don't allow me to buy every time this pieces for prices which are adequate for this pieces. So I also can enjoy lower end pieces. And I like to buy imperfect pieces and enjoy to bring them back to old glory. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,019
|
![]()
Yep, coins too for me.
In fact that was probably my first collection when I was only a little kid, maybe 4 years old, certainly before I went to school. In later years I built a pretty decent collection of Indian hand struck coins, and a good collection of Indonesian currency from the time Indonesia became an independent nation. Haven't added much in recent years, principally because of the cost and rarity of the hand strucks. Would I buy a defective hand struck coin? No, probably not, reason being that I don't know much about these, I'm not a dedicated collector of coins, and I'm not all that keen on learning much about them. They're just something I like. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]() Quote:
Are you referring to this type of coins ? These are Karshapanas of the Maurya Dinasty (300 BC), allegedly found in the Elephanta Island. ... But i learnt they are not that rare ![]() . |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,019
|
![]()
They may not be rare, but I haven't seen them.
However, yes, more or less like that, but mine are much later. I've got a few quite elderly coins, but these are not Indian. I'll put up a pic or two as soon as I get a chance. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
Going to the extreme, which one would you buy: old, beat up khanda with nick-ed edges and simple Old Indian hilt or a modern Rajastani replica with modern damascus blade and a hilt covered in golden decorations?
Both are genuine Indian, both reflect centuries-old tradition, but... the lavish example has no magic of history behind it. It has no tales to tell. I go for the simple and old examples. My wife once asked me whether I thought that some.. at least some... of my sword actually, you know.... KILLED people? Well, - I said, - I hope so! Otherwise, they would not be weapons. Wall hangers, no more. No amount of decoration, Kirk Narduban , exotic pamor, rare wood, shiny blade or perfect fit of the scabbard or a handle can substitute for the aura of history. This is my personal view, and I defininitely don't want to impose my philosophy on anybody. Please, have your rich, decorated, pristine things. I shall be only glad to go for the old, often beat up and simple fighting examples. To each his own. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]() Quote:
![]() I don't collect this kind of weapons, but the reasoning is the same for any area. I also take it that antiquity prevails over any other attributes. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,019
|
![]()
Here are a couple pics of pages from my coin album, pretty typical of the rest of it, a mixture of coins from far away places and mostly historic, with a weighting towards Indian hand strucks.
Not much that is of any real value, not much that is really old. But all a bit exotic. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|