![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,060
|
![]()
Thanks for the clear pictures!
Iam sorry but no matter how much you want to believe it, it is sure to be a later reproduction and not an original mace. the faint lines and very low quality of the fleur de lis in your pictures clearly show that it is a casting and no chiselling in relief. The mace from the berlinerzeughaus inv. nr4453 you posted, is of a totally different category, high quality carving and etching and non comparable to the coarse casting/workmanship of your mace. hereby also attached some pictures how a 16th-century mace should look. Best, Last edited by cornelistromp; 9th August 2014 at 11:45 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|