![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,272
|
![]() Quote:
They barony may very well be a dress piece, since they had both ones for dress and ones for everyday wear. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Centerville, Kansas
Posts: 2,196
|
![]()
Thank you for clarifying this Jose, I knew it was a common form in Luzon but did not know it was not used by the Moro as well. The idea of this being a dress piece would make a lot of sense as being smaller in size it would be much more comfortable to wear during a formal dinner or meeting where being seated for an extended period of time was normally required.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,165
|
![]()
Thank you as well Jose!
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,018
|
![]()
I'm the current owner of the diminutive Barung. My suspicions of this being a child's Barung were confirmed when I wrapped my hand around the hilt and felt the circumference. It's nicely made with a patterned blade and dual colored metal ferrule and rings.
Photos of it post cleaning and with an adult sized Barung for size comparison. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,165
|
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Regards, Detlef |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,272
|
![]()
Albert thank you fore posting this along side the adult sized barong. Now I see it as a child's barony..............
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,018
|
![]() Quote:
The rings are more coppery color in the photos, they have a pinkish hue so I'm thinking that they are coin silver. You're welcome Battara. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,165
|
![]() Quote:
![]() I wonder if there other child barong in collections of members because this is the first one I have seen so far. And I am correct that it has once belong to a datu son? Regards, Detlef |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|