![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,718
|
Hi Alex,
You are right , but as this blade is Indian, and Persian I think it should be called a tulwar blade. The chiselled Persian blades I would call a slightly curved Persian blade. I think new collectors get confused otherwise.Jens |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 936
|
Dana's blade is undoubtedly tulwar. It has all tulwar features including a signature ricasso. The blades shown on Stone's and second on OA site - could be Indian shamshirs' if there are no ricassos, and OA's blade does not have one. Its profiles is also more shamshir-like. Would we call blade a tulwar just because it is chiselled?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Southeast Florida, USA
Posts: 437
|
Thanks Alex, Jens, and Paolo!
To sum up, everyone seems to agree that it is a 19th century Indian tulwar (talwar) with hand chiseled blade decorated in coftgari (koftigari). Is there anyway to narrow the age down to less than a century? Say, the first half, middle, or last half of the 19th century? I've had a little trouble finding a definitive definition for the term "durbars". I am sure you don't mean a "formal meeting" Jens. Do you mean members of a royal court, or someone who demonstrated loyalty to royalty? |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,718
|
I will let you have the last word Alex
.Jens |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | ||
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Southeast Florida, USA
Posts: 437
|
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by dana_w; 31st March 2014 at 11:45 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,242
|
Made for use during the durbar, so intended for ceremony/parade/dress purposes, not necessarily for fighting.
Nice tulwar, much nicer quality chiseling than often seen. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Southeast Florida, USA
Posts: 437
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|