![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
|
![]() Quote:
I Have handled several very similar decorated late 20th century pieces, All though in truth I don't the ones Ive seen had 4mm thick blades. ![]() Is the blade tempered spring steel? ? or if bent stays bent? That's the most defining feature for real or not. spiral |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 45
|
![]()
Thanks to you both!
Will put to the bending test as soon as I am at home, spiral. Here is another one that came from the same source with the same story. I dared not show it due to its condition earlier but I any can only learn. Cheers, taube. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 45
|
![]()
Okay, you are right about the blade.
It is NOT spring steel but can be deformed permanently. Good lesson, thanks again. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
Welcome to the forum!
Actually, I do like the second one much more! Despite the obvious repairs it does show genuine wear and decent workmanship on the decorations. The first one may be an old blade that got completely revamped in modern times? Regards, Kai |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
|
![]()
mmmm that looks much nicer to me!
spiral |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: OKLAHOMA, USA
Posts: 3,138
|
![]()
THERE ARE DAGGERS AND SWORDS MADE JUST FOR TOURISTS THAT THE LOCALS WOULD NEVER USE MOSTLY BECAUSE THEY ARE OVER PRICED FOR WHAT THEY ARE AND INPRACTAL. SOME MAY FOLLOW TRADITIONAL FORMS AND SOME MAY TRY TO LOOK MORE EXPENSIVE FOR SHOW. MOST WOULD NOT HOLD UP FOR EVERY DAY USE BUT COULD SERVE FOR DRESS ONLY. SOME MAY BE ACCEPTABLE FOR LOCAL USE AND OFFERED AT A MUCH LOWER PRICE TO LOCALS THAN TO TOURISTS. THAT KIND OF HEDGES THE SELLERS BETS IN CASE NO TOURISTS SHOW UP.
THE DAGGERS MADE FOR USE BY LOCALS WOULD COME IN MANY DIFFERENT GRADES. SOME WOULD BE A GOOD BLADE WITH VERY PLAIN FITTINGS LIKE A KITCHEN KNIFE OTHERS MIGHT FOLLOW TRADITIONAL FORMS. IN AFRICA THERE ARE MANY BLADES MADE OF SOFT METAL THAT WILL BEND BUT CAN BE STRAIGHTENED. THESE ARE CHEAP AND SOME PREFER THEM BECAUSE THEY ARE EASY TO SHARPEN AND WILL BEND NOT BREAK. THEY DO WEAR DOWN SOONER BUT ARE INEXPENSIVE AND EASY TO REPLACE. THE FITTINGS MAY BE CHEAP BUT MADE TO LOOK EXPENSIVE TO THE ONE BUYING THEM. GLASS STONES AND SHINEY BRASS MAY LOOK AS GOOD AS JEWELS AND GOLD TO SOME LOCAL BUYERS AND BE AS CLOSE AS THEY WILL EVER GET. ![]() REPAIRS MADE ON THE DAGGERS AND THE WORN DOWN BLADES SHOW LOCAL USE AND THOUGH REPAIRS ARE OFTEN POORLY DONE IN THE SOUKS FOR LITTLE MONEY THEY ARE AUTHENTIC AND TYPICAL FOR THE CULTURE. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
|
![]()
I agree with your generalisations Vandoo about soft steel in African weapons. tools & look alikes.
The Koumya although a dress item is a Mahgreb weapon of much dramatic history.. Same as a Mimcha. I am sure there are mild steel nimchas out there, but unless provenaced historicaly would seem poor examples to my way of thinking. But perhaps my viewpoint is just mine... The good ones Ive seen from the 20s & 30s were spring steel. To my The intial featured koumya is very modern & the spot solder work on the handle pieces is just as like to cut the hands or clothes of the wearer as the blade. Spiral |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: OKLAHOMA, USA
Posts: 3,138
|
![]()
I AGREE THERE ARE MANY GOOD KOUMMYA OUT THERE AND THEY ARE THE ONES WE LIKE TO COLLECT. I ALSO SUSPECT THERE MAY BE SOME OUT THERE THAT WE WOULD CONSIDER SUBSTANDARD AND OF VERY POOR QUALITY THAT MAY BE USED BY THOSE WHO CANNOT AFFORD A GOOD QUALITY ONE. THE FIRST ONE IN THIS POST IS OF POOR WORKMANSHIP BUT APPEARS GAUDY WITH FAKE STONES AND SHINEY BRASS. THE SECOND EXAMPLE IS OF BETTER WORKMANSHIP BUT THE REPAIRS WERE POORLY DONE.
I DON'T KNOW IF THE FIRST KOUMMYA IS JUST A GAUDY CHEAP ITEM INTENDED FOR TOURISTS ONLY OR IF THERE IS ANOTHER MARKET FOR SUCH ITEMS LOCALLY. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|