![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 189
|
![]()
Hi, I'm jumping in from the SFI thread -
I found those balls at a mine which was in operation ~mid 20th century, and it was not an iron mine. They are just an example of a type of crushing technology which is used for many different mining and processing applications, not limited to ore type or a particular century. I'm not sure how far back the use of ball mills for ore processing goes in the Mojave, probably to the mid 19th (when it all started there), but it continues to this day, and I think they are more commonly post-industrial tech. Most of the early mining activity in the American SW was probably wiped out by later, more industrial efforts, there are some pretty huge iron mines from the early - mid 20th C. out there. Edit - I checked Biringuccio's Pirotechnia to see what miners were using in the 16th C, and he's pretty vague, lots of mentions of milling things, but I didn't see much description of the mills - he mentions stamp mills & flour-type mills. I recall some reference to the Spanish mines in California crushing ore or mixing with mercury using a stone wheel that rolls around in a circle, but can't find the specific book. Jeff Last edited by Jeff Pringle; 2nd November 2005 at 02:27 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,718
|
![]()
Hi Jeff,
Welcome to the forum. True, mining in the Mojave Desert has been going on for more than a thousand years, if one can trust the written word. Mining gems and a lot of other things. Could your mill balls go for Indian wootz ingots, or should I ask, how much expert do you have to be, to see that they are not Indian ingots, remembering that most of us have only seen ingots on pictures? Jens |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,336
|
![]()
Thanks very much for the further information Jeff .
I'd love to see a picture of the blade that you forged from one of these babys . ![]() Can you get a picture of the pattern or is it too fine to show up ? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 189
|
![]() Quote:
If I had not seen a pile of them next to a giant barrel at a mine, though, I'd be hard pressed to come up with an explanation for the shape. Quote:
![]() Jeff |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,718
|
![]()
Jeff, you write: ‘I got my own crucible steel for that’. Meaning that you are quite sure, the ingot you have is wootz – am I right?
If this is so, why are so many fooled? Is it be course they trust the dealer, or is it be course they don’t look properly, or maybe they don’t know what to look for – so they trust the dealer after all ![]() Jens |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 189
|
![]() Quote:
Some of the steel I’ve made has had professional lab work done, so I can be definite on the wootz, but I also get metal that is more ‘high carbon steel,’ and metal that is more ‘cast iron.’ There’s a slight problem that perhaps very few people care about, which is that until very recently, ‘wootz’ meant ‘that steel they used to make them swords out of’; but now, it’s changing as we begin to gain a practical understanding of the material and a better understanding of it’s history. My definition of ‘wootz’ is: a simple carbon steel with over ~1.3% carbon, forged in such a way as to have banded carbide structures. (Others have slightly different definitions). This takes into account that we understand how to make wootz now, so the old definition is no longer sufficient. The classic ‘wootz’ pattern (how those old swords look) can be made from almost any dendritic steel, and perhaps in some cases from regular hi-carbon barstock, but with those materials the bands are not always saturated with iron carbides. It is an artificial definition, though – they just made steel into swords back then, so even some period pieces don’t match that – everyone just uses the word wootz when referring to blades that look like this: ![]() regardless of alloy content, and now also to items that have the precursor structure, dendrites. A contemporary definition of wootz for those of us who make it is just now starting to be possible, so there’s going to be a bunch of ‘yes it’s wootz’, ‘no it’s not’ going on, and random lumps of cast mystery steel may or may not be included when it all shakes out. If I were to acquire (ethically, Ann!) a genuine old wootz cake, the last thing I would do is forge it, that’d be a terrible thing to do to such a wonderful artifact of pre-industrial technology! And, of course, any misrepresentation of items as either old or new wootz, ingot or blade, confuses the situation and is BAD ![]() Quote:
But there are only a couple reference works with pictures of the original ingots out there, so unless you are melting steel in your back yard and becoming that familiar with the external morphology & metallography of steel ingots, all you really have to go on is the seller’s promise. BTW: Nice cross section photo of an old Indian wootz ingot in “The History of Metallography” C.S. Smith, ISBN 0-262-69120-5, as well as a discussion of wootz’s importance to our understanding of the structure of metals. The first contemporary ‘what is wootz’ article, from a technical perspective: http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM...even-9809.html (note how one of the blades discussed is too low in carbon to count (to the authors) as wootz, but another has just 1% and is included – I’d think that one was just hi carbon crucible steel - but they all have some pattern I’d call wootzy) Last edited by Jeff Pringle; 3rd November 2005 at 03:14 PM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,718
|
![]()
Thank you Jeff for your interesting explanation. From a friend I did know that you are a skilled blade maker, but I did not know you also made your own ingots.
Nice blade you show ![]() Jens |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Deceased
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: USA, DEEP SOUTH, GEORGIA, Y'all hear?
Posts: 121
|
![]()
First I appreciate Jeff for entering into this discussion,
His information is very informative to me anyway. Thank you and Welcome. I have a wootz knife (Bowie) made by Al Pendray , made from his wootz, also I had him make a Bowie out of a old original wootz ingot, both has a very "wootzy" pattern. This Alwar Armory wootz ingot was written up by Dr. Verhoeven, Pendray and Dauksch in a paper " The Continuing Study of Damascus Steel: Bars from the Alwar Armory" in the September 2004 issue of the JOM.The Wootz Ingot/bar I gave them, for testing, is labeled #3 in Table 1 page 18. I readily admit that just making a blade out of an old wootz ingot is not a good practice. However a lot of technical information was derived, in this case by doing so. The reaming half of the ingot/bar with the Alwar inscription is still intact. see: http://www.vikingsword.com/ubb/Forum1/HTML/002326.html Do you perchance make wootz knives for sale, also? I am posting this to let all to know that Jens has saved someone a lot of money ($1000) by asking this ( not to hard a question this time ![]() In April of 2003 I purchased a wootz ingot ( not the one mention above) in order to have a knife made out of it by Pendray, it was tested and found to be cast iron, not wootz. I returned the ingot and received full credit form the seller. The exact, same ingot went back up for sale, recently. I was in a quandary as to what to do about the information that I had about the "wootz' ingot. When I checked the seller web site, Monday of this week, the ingot is no longer listed. Not listed as being sold, just not there. That to me indicates that this posting by Jens was read and that the correct and Honorable action was taken by the pending seller of this ingot. By pulling this item, also relieved me of just what to do about it as I was, other than the sell, probably the only one that was aware of it being non wootz. Using this forum, learning from it and the helping out of one another is the reason I enjoy it ![]() Gene |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|