|  21st November 2013, 09:54 AM | #11 | 
	| Member 
				 
				Join Date: Nov 2013 Location: Cairo, Egypt. 
					Posts: 142
				      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by ariel
					
				 Jim,I agree with Ahmed, Ibrahim and yourself that, if true, identification of the sword in question as a true Dhu'l Fakar would be an incredibly important discovery.
 I am still not convinced  that this  is the case. Discoveries of such magnitude demand irrefutable proofs.
 
 As  the barest minimum, one would like to know with high degree of certainty that this sword  could  be confidently dated to  not later than   the beginning of 7th century. If such a proof is not available, the entire argument of this sword belonging to Muhammed  who died in 622 C.E.  loses a leg to stand on. Am I missing something here?
 
 With best wishes to all the participants,
 Ariel
 |  A quick correction: Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) died in 632 C.E.; not in 622 C.E. which was the year of his Hijra (migration) from Makkah to Madinah.
 
Cheers! 
Ahmed Helal Hussein
		 | 
	|   |   |