![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: CHRISTCHURCH NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 2,786
|
![]() Quote:
Stu |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 534
|
![]()
@JamesKelly, the bal is 14mm wide.
Khanjar1 has a very plausible answer here, since the tool does not look like it was designed to take the mechanical stress that a breechplug would cause. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Halstenbek, Germany
Posts: 203
|
![]()
Here is a really simple and unimpressive tool from Fokke Museum in Bremen, Germany, described as a clearing needle (Räumnadel). It is not dated and I guess it is from 17th or 18th century. The shaft between the handle and the needle assumes that the tool was inserted in hilt or a sheath (probably in connection with a bandolier?). I am not really sure of the material of the neelde whether it is iron or bronze because on the needle are brownish residues like rost but it also has a greenish patina like copper alloys, I preferrably assume it is made from iron.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 534
|
![]()
A very nice tool indeed, to open up the ventholes from a flintlock or even a wheellock. Because blackpowder leaves some residue it may clog the vent (the hole in the barrel). I heared the name vent pick a few times but i am not sure if it is correct.
The metal is most likely hardened iron. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Michigan, U.S.A.
Posts: 108
|
![]()
Just touch your Räumnadel with a magnet.
Iron or steel will be attracted, bronze or copper not. On my tool the U-shape opening seems too large for a nipple wrench, at least for the nipple now in the rifle. Drum means drum, that thing screwed into the barrel into which the nipple goes. About that term Grandpa would have been clear. Just do not know what he was thinking about this tool. And that "buck and ball" mould that started this thread is more complex than I have seen American tools to be. From what I have seen, I think it quite unlikely for an old American mould to have folding handles. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
My 'Räumnadel' is a very basic one, not much worthy; probably 19th century ... or even later, if it was used in operational gun replicas. In this case it could either be for clearing ventholes or percussion niples.
I was found on the grounds of a shooting range, after a contest involving all types of ignition, from matchlock to percussion, open to originals and reproductions. I wouldn't know what name these things have/had over here; arms lexicon is not 'universal'; we call venthole 'ear' and nipple 'chimney'. . |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
I kept thinking about these ball & buck moulds and, as i had seen one of the kind several months ago in a local dealer, i went back there and bought the thing.
This one is said to be a military version. I wonder if i may date it end XVIII century. The cavities fit (close to) 15 m/m and 18 m/m bullets (balls) and a 9 m/m buck shot. The mould itself is rather surdy, made in bronze. The whole device weighs 1,150 Kgs. I wish Adrian were around to comment on this example; i am sure this is his area, both tool and period, and would be thankful for his input, with all eventual corrections to the above assumptions ![]() Other members opinions will obviously be welcome ![]() . |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|