Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 24th August 2013, 06:39 PM   #1
fearn
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,247
Default

I'd disagree, and I'm not even sure it's from Oceania.

As noted in other threads, there are two different ways (Polynesian and Micronesian) to tie on teeth, as far as we can determine. Polynesian, done properly, is to place the tooth in a socket, drill a hole through both tooth and socket, and tie it in. Micronesian (Truk and Kiribati) is to put a thin splint of wood on either side of a row of teeth with drilled holes, and tie the structure together between the teeth. I've never seen a Marshallese shark-tooth club, either.

This mounting method looks like neither of those. Nor does it look badly done, which is normally a sign of a tourist piece.

While it could be Melanesian, I'm going to suggest something off the wall: Sumba in eastern Indonesia. Good ol'd Don Draeger, in Weapons and Fighting Arts of Indonesia, noted that they made clubs of "all imaginable shapes and usually had their business ends imbedded [sic] with shark and sawfish teeth." (p. 196, fig. 154) As usual, his illustration leaves a lot to be desired. I don't think we've had a Sumban club on here before, but I wonder if that's what we've got here?

F
fearn is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.