Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 23rd July 2013, 03:37 PM   #24
Maurice
Member
 
Maurice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,453
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gustav
To me this collection simply is not serious enough. We should look on the item and not on the tag.
To me we should discuss this pedang and not the other items.
Than we wouldn't have a deflected discussion.
And it is a fact the tag was on the item, so it's not bad discussing the label also.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Gustav
Maurice, you probably have seen the other indonesian items from the original auction. These items surely weren't collected before 60ties.
Yes I do have. Maybe you're right about the kerisses, as I have limited knowledge about them and I don't collect them myself. According other items I disagree in some cases. There were also some good 19th century pieces (not krisses) which would be good collection items They could be collected way earlier before the 60's. But maybe they're collected a month ago but are 19th century?



Quote:
Originally Posted by Gustav
Especially the kerisses have touch of beeing made to catch a colector with some bigger money, yet not so good understanding of materia.
I'm not collecting kerisses and I must agree I didn't like all of them either, but irrelevant to the pedang.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Gustav
You also see, how many indonesian items are returned to the auction house.
Yes, but here again. What does it have to do with the discussed pedang in this thread?
What does this imply to you then?
I wouldn't have bought those "returned" pieces in the first place, so I wouldn't have to return them afterwards.
And f.i. the returned rencong is a good original old one, though not fancy!?
Maybe it was only one "non seriously buyer" who bid on the all later "returned" items? Who knows?



Quote:
Originally Posted by Gustav
I would believe it in the same degree as I believe in the authenticity of the most other items of this collection.
What do you think about the pedang item nr. 51? And the authenticity of the rencong? Both also 60's?
My opinion is that these are both good old ones, and the "pedang" nr. 51 is very attractive also in my opinion and worthy in a good collection! But......not relevant to my pedang which I put up for discussion here in the first place. So I leave it with this!



Quote:
Originally Posted by Gustav
For comparison some other stuff coming out of Lombok these days.
Now here we have something relevant! I agree this one is as extensively inlaid as mine, and looks like the same craftmanship! This is relevent material to compare! Thanks for posting this one!



Quote:
Originally Posted by Gustav
I stated my opinion about this item in the previous post and have nothing more to add to this thread.
OK. Thanks!
Maurice is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.