|  | 
| 
 | |||||||
|  | 
|  | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes | 
|  | 
|  23rd May 2013, 12:58 AM | #1 | 
| Member Join Date: Jan 2005 
					Posts: 278
				 |   
			
			Hi Jean, Just got this verbal news from the museum, they retracted their earlier comments. After undergone several tests, the blade is of extra-ordinary archaic buda forms with wayang motifs. Blade thickness is considered unordinary-very thin through out perhaps one of its kind in this form. The hilt is new and mendak comes from the 1800s era. rgrds,   | 
|   |   | 
|  23rd May 2013, 05:02 AM | #2 | 
| Member Join Date: May 2006 
					Posts: 7,084
				 |   
			
			Very interesting. Do you know what tests were done, and how? The qualifications of the testers? Or are we just looking at an opinion? Thank you. | 
|   |   | 
|  23rd May 2013, 05:44 AM | #3 | 
| Member Join Date: Jan 2005 
					Posts: 278
				 |   
			
			Thanks Alan. I would not question museum's standard. tq    it is a Full Stop. | 
|   |   | 
|  23rd May 2013, 07:39 AM | #4 | 
| Member Join Date: May 2006 
					Posts: 7,084
				 |   
			
			Thank you for your enlightening response.
		 | 
|   |   | 
|  23rd May 2013, 09:38 AM | #5 | 
| Member Join Date: Jan 2005 
					Posts: 278
				 |   
			
			Kind regards,Mykeris.    | 
|   |   | 
|  23rd May 2013, 06:06 PM | #6 | 
| Member Join Date: Jun 2009 
					Posts: 1,740
				 |   
			
			Hello Mykeris, Hum, do you feel satisfied with the fickle opinion from the museum "expert" who first said that it is a replica and then a genuine antique piece? Is he a specialist of the antique Buddha/ Hindu period in Indonesia and did he give you some valid reasons for changing his mind in this way? Are wayang motifs on a blade made during archaic Buddha period realistic?  If I were in your place I would not give too much confidence in his assessment. Regards Last edited by Jean; 24th May 2013 at 08:45 AM. | 
|   |   | 
|  | 
| 
 | 
 |