![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 462
|
![]()
I do not think that it is modern
the galuchat on the scabbard is quite worn, sign of anciennetee, as well as the Interior of the worn sleeve, the patina that i was on the blade before cleaning...and quality of work, it is very thin and neat |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,818
|
![]()
This is not a sword of antiquity. I would suggest 1980s at best.
Disregarding the second hidden sword, the sword size and profile is found in antiquity. The method of manufacture and materials in the sword shown is considered "New". Gavin |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 462
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 407
|
![]()
Yes, Gavin is correct. The work is all modern.
Interestingly, there are period examples of these double swords, but the majority are recent. I have seen two antique examples, and both appeared to be from the late 19th early 20th c. period. They are copies of regulation duan dao, but they have a bit of a novelty feel to them and may have appealed to foreigners. Mine has what seems to be a recycled jian blade next to the longer, hefty, duan dao blade. The copy posted is trying to match the style and period of the originals but the workmanship is a tell tale. Josh |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|