![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
Hello Moshah,
Quote:
As you know, not that long ago, people used to freely move back and forth between Sumatra and W Malaysia. Regards, Kai |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 171
|
![]() Quote:
Dear Kai, Of course we still could not confirm the origin of the blade, as much as I would really love to have it labelled "made in N.Malayan" as that would explain much on the absence of pamor material. The dress (pix attached) were bona-fide Bugis. Albeit being newly made (which would lessen the inclination of possibility that it comes from there), the overall image has the Bugis look into them, and so does the blade. If it was a conformed Bugis' badik, I think it is quite "obscene" for it not to have any pamor. Perhaps, made for the peasant... Of course, I am speaking with my limited knowledge in Badik, Bugis arms and socioculture, and limited experience too... ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |||
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
Hello Moshah,
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The scabbard on the example sold by Artzi is definitely not Sulawesi nor is mine; its ivory buntut also doesn't suggest that this piece was just a low-end version. The hilt on my piece does show the "multicolored" wood typically favored by N Malays, too. Regards, Kai |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |||
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 171
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
![]() Quote:
BTW, would love to see your badik as well, Kai.. ![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 171
|
![]()
Hi guys,
Received it today, safely. I would say the hilt and sheath looks decently new - not a slight of dark, blackish hue that usually takes place on antique hilts. Unless it was clean thoroughly, I stand to be corrected. On the other hand, they were made out of nice wood plot and of a considerable good workmanship, it seems. Apparently the shallow fuller can be clearly seen, as the slight concave runs from the first inch of the base, straight (and tapered) to the tip. The partial double-edge started a little bit further from the mid blade towards the tip. The blade was really smooth to the touch. As I ran my finger along the blade from the base towards the tip through the mid-section, the feel was almost velvety. I know some Malay keris with this same attributes and it is locally coined as "besi baldu" - means velvety iron. Perhaps the absence of pamor contributes to this feel but I do have few non-pamorred kerises, and it feel nothing like this. Except one, old Sumatran / Palembang sepokal which shares this sensation of touch... Kai, I've tried to ask the seller from where it comes from but as I've predicted - to no avail. So guys, is the blade a Bugis, a Malay or perhaps a Sumatran? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 171
|
![]()
We're still in the grey, are we?
BTW Kai, does this badik resembles that one of yours? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 125
|
![]()
This is also a Peninsular piece which in Kelantan is usually called a "badik Bugis" ie. Bugis style, to distinguish it from the more typical Malay badik which have the mar.
BTW the piece pictured in post #5 is a typical Kelantan style badik and looks like a nice one. Good ones are hard to find. If you have the scabbard I'd love to see it. Also, the piece in post #3 now belongs to me. Such double edged blades are almost certainly a European influence adopted from Western military style blades. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|