![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
The same is true about blades in the Turkish Chamber in Dresden and in the Wallace.
My guess the conservators : 1. Wanted to keep them in the "as found" condition ( as sugested by Charles) 2. Did not want to subject them to acid etching, ie corrosion. Academically correct, but esthetically disappointing. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Buraimi Oman, on the border with the UAE
Posts: 4,408
|
![]()
Salaams and thanks for bringing up this brillant thread... The picture at #11 is absolutely relevant to the sword under scrutiny presently and I had forgotten that I already had posted with Michael Blalock on this sighting...Currently we are puzzling over the weapon as being Yemeni etc.
see http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/newrep...ote=1&p=152299 Scroll down 12 pictures(final picture) and see 3rd from right sword. Regards, Ibrahiim al Balooshi. ![]() Last edited by Ibrahiim al Balooshi; 1st February 2013 at 06:26 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Mother North
Posts: 189
|
![]()
Thank you Erlikhan, if you are ever still around!
![]() I think my heart just broke from seeing too many awesome kilic with too many great yelmans... Also I like the keris and especially the rencong in #11 is drool'a'licious! - Thor |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 409
|
![]()
Interesting to see the daggers in post #11, no 5 described as Turkish?
Regards Richard |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|