![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,637
|
![]()
Thanks Marto for your feedback!
And also for confirming that this in fact is a proper Balinese knife. I have so far only seen the highly decorated versions. Maybe because those where the ones that the Dutch prefered to "bring" with them home in the old days as exotic souvenirs? Michael |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,209
|
![]()
Michael,
Justin gave the right answer. It is a balinese golok. Stone shows a similar piece with a different hilt. I had the honour to admire and hold one with a polychrome painted sheath and same hilt like this one in the collection of a member of Tammens study group that Tammens mentioned in his books. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 52
|
![]()
Well, Henk, I suppose it is barely possible that all those Balinese people I have spoken to over the years who were using, or who owned one of these knives, were wrong.
Equally, I suppose it is possible that Mr. Stone was right, even though his record demonstrates that he was often, very often, wrong. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,637
|
![]()
Marto,
Please correct me if I am wrong but isn't golok originally a local term for a short Javanese(!) sword before it became "bastardized" by us Western collectors? Michael |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 179
|
![]()
As far as I have assertained through a few books and people, comments, and questions here on the forum; ' golok ' can described a variety of Indonesian knives/short swords.I didn't mean to say that this was definately anything,I only meant to offer an alternative to 'wedung' which I thought was a distinctly different type of knife.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,336
|
![]()
A Wedung is a 'Javanese' cultural artifact .
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 940
|
![]()
I know you all know just how much i hate making controversial statements
![]() ![]() There are certainly MANY errors in the writings of Stone, Raffles, Tammens and others. This does not make their works useless by far, but i think it is important that we take care not to assume that just because it got written down and published that it must be right. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|