![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hungary
Posts: 72
|
![]()
Thank you, very nice pictures! Btw, that mailcoat...
![]() ![]() What did you search for? I've tried it in countless ways, but I just couldn't find these... ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Merseyside, UK
Posts: 222
|
![]() Quote:
![]() I simply use the "images" option on Google and type in a variety of search terms, usually things like "Turkish armour", "Turkish armor", "Iranian helmets" etc. Here's an example: http://images.google.co.uk/images?q=...=Search+Images |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 190
|
![]()
Gentlemen,
Coats of the type you are referring to, with very large, flat rings are called BAYDANA in Russian. They were actually worn over another coat of smaller rings. The Mamluks also wore coats of large, flat rings but as a primary, rather than secondary, defense. These generally fell out of use in the Near East in the 15th century, but persisted in Russia until the 17th. Sincerely, Ham |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Merseyside, UK
Posts: 222
|
![]()
Thanks Ham, I know very little about Russian armour, that is one of the first websites i've seen with relatively detailed photos of Russian armour. I wasn't aware that the mamluks used mail shirts with very large rings, all the Mamluk mail shirts i have seen have normal size rings.
I also found the Russian krugs interesting in that with many of them the plates are not connected by mail like Turco-Iranian krugs, but are attached to some kind of leather liner. It's almost like they are an intermediate stage between mail-and-plate krugs and chahar aina cuirasses. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hungary
Posts: 72
|
![]()
Norm of Silk Roads said that the main distinction between turkish and russian krug is that the latter is made with leather straps. So I wasn't suprised on that.
![]() So these were worn on finer mail? Ok, then... I've heard about this, but I've never thought that "large" means THIS large. Only a bet: the mamluks confronted mostly sabres is CQ, did they? Do you have any info about the ring sizes? Btw, Ham: from where do you have so much information on these subjects? Are there any kind of book on these? Even now, I have a veeeery long wish list on books, but there's never enough. ![]() Oh, and thanks for the input! ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Merseyside, UK
Posts: 222
|
![]()
The mamluks confronted a wide variety of enemies. In the 13th century they fought European Crusaders, Mongol hordes and each other. The 14th century was a relatively peaceful period, their main enemies were each other. In the 15th century they fought Timur-i-Lenk, European Crusaders on Cyprus, the Kara-Koyonlu and Ak-Koyunlu (although these were minor skirmishes), in the years 1500-1517 the mamluks fought the Portuguese in the Indian Ocean, with mixed results (they hated naval warfare) and finally the Ottoman Turks with disastrous results.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,325
|
![]()
Ahriman, have been watching this and wanted to answer some earlier questions regarding the Moro armor. Here is a link from Oriental-arms to a Moro armor piece with a closeup on the latches. One end of the latch would go into one of the holes in of the rods on the left and the other would be free to go into the one on the right. Behind the plate is brass that would help hold the piece in place to place the latches in place.
http://www.oriental-arms.com/photos.php?id=1466 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|