![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 413
|
![]()
Good evening,
I hope I'm not upsetting anybody if I say that the well formed ricasso and the equally well formed circular end to the fuller on what seems to be quite a hefty blade don't strike me as very Arab. Like Ariel I could quite believe it to be an Afghan blade. However my main point is to link the mark, which Ariel thinks is Mazar i Sharif and Ibrahim Omani, to those on the mysterious daggers in this thread http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...2&page=2&pp=30. It would seem this type of mark was really in quite widespread use. Regards Richard Last edited by Richard G; 21st August 2012 at 06:54 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Buraimi Oman, on the border with the UAE
Posts: 4,408
|
![]() Quote:
I rather think the blade to be European. Regards, Ibrahiim al Balooshi. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Nashville
Posts: 317
|
![]()
I was trying to stay away from the subject and the whole worng info about mazar e sharif thing but it seems like that is not happening.
First, there never was a Mazar e Sharif arsenal, I explained this b4 but for some odd reason it keep popping up again and again. It is a misconception that just causes confusion for people. On this blade itself, I'd lean towards an European blade as Ibrahim is thinking. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 737
|
![]()
I do not believe the blade is European, because the fullers are very uneven and there are many small smithing "errors" where the layers (pieces) of metal were forged together - the blade was definitely hand forged.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,635
|
![]()
Hi All,
I'm inclined to agree with Tatyana, these fissures are not what I would expect to see on a 19thC European blade. Tatyana do you think the fuller is ground or forged? My Regards, Norman. P.S. Looks like a nice hefty functional blade. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|