![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,015
|
![]()
With regard to those two distinctive features of kerises and krises (encircled in the attached pic, which pic I merely hastily snatched from the Internet), what would be the latest views on which century or centuries those first appeared?
Miguel, the most recent opinions relating to the development of the Modern Keris (ie, the keris form that followed the Keris Buda) have not yet been published. With God's blessing perhaps later this year they may see daylight. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Manila, Phils.
Posts: 1,042
|
![]()
Gustav, thanks for the pics.
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,280
|
![]() Quote:
regarding the pictures I posted in#43, I would like to pose my opinion, which, of course has not much weight. The kris without gonjo is the one nearest to the Javanese/Balinese keris. Yet even this kris has features we never would see on Javanese/Balinese keris, regardless of their age. The kris with gold hilt is a big step towards typical Sulu kris. Ron's blade in my eyes has a very Mindano like Gandhik area, which even would not fit the features of the more Jav./Bal.-like Sulu Gandhik. Here I really don't understand, why it has to be made from am a smith from present day Indonesia territory - just becouse it has a roundish tang? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|