![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Witness Protection Program
Posts: 1,730
|
![]()
so i reckon this kris is older than dirt then, right? lol, just kidding
![]() ![]() ![]() excellent discussion so far guys, please keep it up. lorenz my friend, your research has come a long way since our last conversation on this subject matter! very impressive!!! please keep it up. i really thought we could get together for some sarsi and sisig this coming january for my bro's wedding, but since that was cancelled i will have to wait another year, lol. on the side note, i can't help but notice the similarity of the wirework form the gold handle dagger handle on top of this page to sajen's gunong: http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showthread.php?t=15927 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,273
|
![]()
Spunjer, your kris share some similar features with this one, which perhaps even could be older, becouse it appears to have posessed a straight gonjo once:
http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showthread.php?t=15256 The tang of this one is disturbed, yet it also seems to be between square and rounded. We will never know, how looks like the tang of this one, also straight gonjo: http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showthread.php?t=13785 It seems to me also, the two linked kris are older becouse of features of Gandhik.They are close to very close to Javanese keris; the gandhik of your kris is already almost like this strange mixed Maguindanao/Maranao gandhik, which pops up so often in the last time. Perhaps is your kris a very early Mindanao kris? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,272
|
![]()
I would say that the top one of your pictures (the one with the early golden hilt) is Sulu, although that early back we are not as sure because there are few examples from that period.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,273
|
![]() Quote:
One more kris with straight gonjo Gavin sold a time ago: http://www.swordsantiqueweapons.com/s250_full.html Spunjer's kris is really interesting becouse of its very complete early kris features, together with Gandhik area which looks Mindanao to me. Would you agree on it? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,272
|
![]()
Oh no question that Spunger's kris is an early kris (with a great blade!).
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Witness Protection Program
Posts: 1,730
|
![]()
thx for posting additional pictures, gustav! i noticed as well that on those other examples, the asang2x mark is non-existent. looks as if it never had asang2x. the one with the gold hilt: i'm almost certain the tang on that one is circular or squarish, as oppose to the rectangular ones. again, with a narrow base like that, there's nowhere to attach the stirrup, or should i say the stirrup wasn't part of the plan..
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,273
|
![]()
Dear Spunjer,
the Sulu kris with golden hilt had a stirrup for asang-asang, yet although the hilt is very early there of course still is some possibility the hilt is later then blade and blade was intended to be without asang-asang. In Cato's book on page 72 there is a hilt with similar construction of stirrup for asang-asang, which would let us think, this kind to attach asang-asang is also old if not the oldest one. On your kris I also see somethingwhich could be markings from front asang-asang, yet again, it could be attached later and then dissapeared again. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|