![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 422
|
![]()
It's single-edged, and respectably sharp. The blade has a fairly uniform taper in thickness towards the tip, from 5.1m near the hilt to about 2.5mm an inch short of the tip.
No bolster, but the blade end of the hilt is carved in the shape one would expect of a bolster. This would work as a kitchen knife, if sharpened better. At the moment, it's sharper than the kitchen knives some people use, but not as sharp as a kitchen knife should be. As for "form follows function", most conventional-bladed kukris have conventional kukri scabbards, whether Nepalese, Indian, or Afghan. But I've see (somewhere on www) a couple of Indian conventional-bladed kukris with slotted-back scabbards. More than one form can fulfill the function. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
|
![]() Quote:
{ignore sales pitch re.ww1.... ww2 is much more likely it know seems.} spiral |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 422
|
![]() Quote:
How well do they work? Do they work if worn in a sash? In my experience with slotted scabbards, they need a lot more care when re-sheathing. Still, perhaps more elegant than a chunky wide-mouth scabbard. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
|
![]()
Would not work well in a sash Timo, normaly have belt loops.
Spiral |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 422
|
![]()
#31 looks like a typical Armoury kukri. No pommel, inscription on the spine in Devanagari, reading "Sri 3 Candra Varas(?) 2/48", which would date it to being in the Armoury in the early 20th century (1901-1929). I have no experience reading Devanagari, so perhaps I have the battalion (i.e., "Varas") wrong - any corrections appreciated. 14.5" blade, 800g.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
Thanks a lot for chiming in, Jonathan and Gav!
Hello Timo, Quote:
Regards, Kai |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|