![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 14
|
![]()
I received the following comments from a curator of a very respected Native American Indian Museum.
Interesting piece! I can't say fershure that it's Tlingit, nor even that it's Native-made, but it certainly looks as if it's modeled on a traditional Tlingit dagger. The workmanship on the blade is more crude than most of the ones I've seen from the Skagway workshop, but I've seen images of equally-crude Alaskan pieces clearly (and hastily, I think) made for the tourist trade. I can't figure out about the copper, why it has all that pitting in it - suspect it's some kind of commercial sheet copper but don't know why it's so rough. .... The pommel is strange - is it supposed to be copper also? It looks more like carved horn or antler and, again, seems to be an attempt to look Tlingit but whoever did it was far from masterful. It looks, in a weird sort of way, like those Greenland masks that were collected in the 1920s or 1930s - there was an article about them in Arctic Anthropology but I can't lay my hands on the citation. I guess, though, it's intended to be Tlingit or at least Northwest Coast - the ears and the treatment of the nostrils in particular kind of suggest that. I couldn't begin to put a date on it - although, interestingly enough there's a collection of Tlingit masks at Princeton that were acquired by Sheldon Jackson in the 1880s and they're pretty poorly carved, painted with bright enamel paints and then shellacked or something - When Erna Gunther first examined them in the 1960s she remarked that it was astonishing that so much bad work was being done so early. Need I say that the blade is decorative only and would never have been functional? these are just my thoughts... ![]() tomahawak |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|