![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 422
|
![]()
A few more:
#10 Estimated to be early 20th century (1900s - 1920s), horn handle which is very wide front-to-back (side-to-side seems to be a normal thickness). Comfortable in hand, except for the damage to the front corner. #11 Don't know any details about this. It was very filthy when I got it; it's still pretty filthy now, but much cleaner. Looks like some damage to the edge has been fixed. #12 Brass and grey metal grip. Very nice weight and balance, lovely to swing. The owner before the previous owner claimed WW2 or earlier (supposed WW2 bring-back). Just got this one, and am very pleased with its ergonomics. What might the grey metal be? I don't think it's aluminium. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
|
![]()
Hi Timo,
The grey metal is usualy a "pot" metal of any handy meltable scrap with a low melting point that getys thrown i8n the pot! Usualy a very high zinc content due to the prolific use of old toothpaste tubes & cylinder battery casings. Spiral |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 422
|
![]()
A few more:
#13 is very small. Seller estimated 1920s. #14 is also small. Horn handle. Last 1/2 century or so, and Indian ("Tempered steel, Made in India"). #15 is engraved, has 8 white metal pins as decoration, aluminium I think, around larger brass rivets. Horn grip. #16 is supposedly from the Royal Nepalese Arsenal in 2003, nicely handling for the size. #17 is a fancy one, velvet and silver(?) scabbard, horn grip. 2 large chips in the blade (or 1 large, 1 medium, depending on opinion). Seller estimated c. 1900. #18 is modern. I thought, "Cute! Somebody makes a tulwar-hilted kukri!" It's OK, but I strongly suspect I could do better myself with a $20 ebay tulwar hilt and a bare blade. Task for the future! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 422
|
![]()
And one more very long one:
#19 is very long. Modern. Do very long kukri like this have any history, or are they modern fantasy/martial arts items? This one is a nice fighting sword. As well as being about the length of the (modern) wakizashi I show it with, it's also about the same weight (1oz heavier, 771g vs 742g). As my longest kukri, I also photographed it with my smallest kukri. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
|
![]()
O yes they can have history! Battle or sacrifice! {Some wall hangers too out there. & modern pieces to.}
This link. Shows a few of mine & explains a little about them. Spiral linky. Also a thread on this forum including links to various other kukri slaughter pics. {Caution advised for link for Vegitareans or upset by animal slaughter.} http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showthread.php?t=10292 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 422
|
![]()
Or, more specifically, are very long kukri of this form - very slender - historical? A couple of modern makers do these, but I haven't seen any old ones.
The top one in your link is about the same length and weight (a little longer, and a little lighter). Should be a very good fighting kukri! Modern "sacrificial" kukri I see (i.e., what's made for the tourist market as sacrificial kukri) seem to be much heavier than yours, 50oz and up. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
|
![]()
Not of the same shape as yours ,no I dont think so.
Modern kukris are often more heavily built & sometimes more clumsy than many antiques. {Although you get some clumsy old ones to!} Many corners are cut compared to the old ways. Certanly the finest craftsmen of 100 years ago are not equaled today. {And thats understating it.} The only 100% sacrificial kukri of mine is the bottom kora handled one from First quarter/third of 20th century. {Gifted in 20s.} The others could be sacrificial but are also likely to have originaly been used for war. {But of course in there long lives will have probably been used for sacrafice as well, while still in Nepal.} Spiral |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|