![]()  | 
	
| 
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#1 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Apr 2005 
				
				
				
					Posts: 3,255
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			BTW, I assume that this keris is Makassarese? If so, is it politically correct to pigeon-hole it as a "Keris Bugis" or is there a more suitable catch-all term?
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#2 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Jan 2005 
				Location: Singapore 
				
				
					Posts: 1,248
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Hi Kai,  
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	The blade looks like a javanese patrem with it's thin and longer ganja. It looks as though it was reshaped from a longer piece. The pamor lines does not flow with the luks. (I have a javanese patrem, of a different form. See here). The blade and the sandang walikat sheath form looks complementary to each other. In your assembly, the hilt and pendokok (hilt cup) looks a little 'out of place'. Without the longer 'neck' of the pendokok, the hilt would probably would not fit the entire length of the peksi. The hulu and pendokok is of the Sulawesi (Celebes) form. I have a short Sulawesi keris with a mini tebeng-styled sheath. See it here. (The sheath is complementary to the form. But don't follow my pendokok  . Wrong styled. Mine is a peninsular styled pendokok.)Nevertheless, should you decide to change the sheath, I would recommend a tebeng-styled sheath or another Sulawesi form (see here). Feel free to disagree.  
		 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#3 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Dec 2004 
				Location: The Netherlands 
				
				
					Posts: 1,209
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Kai, Alam Shah is right. The blade is a javanese one. Javanese blades were highly apreciated so it is no surprise that you see javanese blades mounted as a buginese keris. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	But i don't think yours is a bugis. The walikat sandang sheath is more javanese and the uikiran is too large for this blade. I guess that the previous owner replaced it. Maybe you can find a small ukiran for a patrem to complete its javanese origin.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#5 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Mar 2005 
				
				
				
					Posts: 568
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Hello Kai, 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	Could you describe the process of electrolytic rust removal or direct me to a source of information for same? I would really like to try out the method. Sincerely, RobT  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#6 | |
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Apr 2005 
				
				
				
					Posts: 3,255
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 I just started a new thread on this method so that others can join in... http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showthread.php?p=14089 Regards, Kai  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#7 | |
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Apr 2005 
				
				
				
					Posts: 3,255
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 What kind of wood would this be if of Javanese origin? (It's carved pretty crudely and the wood is very light.) AFAIK, there are no pines on Jawa but they are native to Sulawesi (mountain peaks)... As given above, the blade is really stubby. The Sulawesi hilt is of average size, give or take. The whole assembly is feels more like a Moro gunong than the more graceful keris patrem I've seen pics of! Regards, Kai  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#8 | |||
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Apr 2005 
				
				
				
					Posts: 3,255
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 Quote: 
	
 Quote: 
	
   Regards, Kai  | 
|||
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#9 | |
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Jan 2005 
				Location: Singapore 
				
				
					Posts: 1,248
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
  
		Last edited by Alam Shah; 6th September 2005 at 04:40 AM. Reason: grammar  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#10 | |
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Apr 2005 
				
				
				
					Posts: 3,255
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
      What I meant though: Why would one want to narrow down the original luks and thereby messing with the pamor miring instead of just shortening the blade? Regards, Kai  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#11 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Jan 2005 
				Location: Singapore 
				
				
					Posts: 1,248
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			I guess, smaller blade is easier to conceal and use, for women (or men), in close quarters engagement. That's what patrems are for.  
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 
		 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#12 | |
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Apr 2005 
				
				
				
					Posts: 3,255
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 However, I still don't see why it would be preferable (from a functional POV) to "smooth out" the originally broader luk since the total width of the blade doesn't seem limiting to me. If a more slender blade is the main goal, just grind off both edges equally (following the pamor) and, thus, preserve the original shape/proportions. So, is the actually seen change of blade proportions/design some sort of traditional dapur "requirement" for keris Jawa? Of course, it's much easier to rework a pamor mlumah (tiban) blade but I have problems to imagine that a bladesmith would compromise a nice pamor miring for anything but a very good reason... Any ideas? Regards, Kai  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
![]()  | 
	
	
		
  | 
	
		
  |