![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 407
|
![]()
Great to see this example. I have one without a scabbard that I thought was Eastern Chinese/Tibetan/Bhutanese. It's nice to see i was close, but even nicer to know exactly what I have.
You mention that yours is mono-steel. Are you sure? Mine has Tibetan style hairpin folding, and it seems as though yours might as well. Josh |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: College Park, MD
Posts: 186
|
![]()
I'd say that one that shows hairpin folding would probably be 19th century. At the beginning of the 20th, Claude White talked about the loss of the traditional methods with the importation of billets of Indian steel.
Bans do bear a resemblance to Bhutanese swords---if you disregard or look beyond the finish of the upper-class patag. Reduced to their basic blades and wood hilts and scabbards, some of the working knives and commoners' short swords look more like bans, if you were to remove half the scabbard. It is the ends of the blades that difer more in shape. I have some photos at home somewhere that I can post later. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Kernersville, NC, USA
Posts: 793
|
![]() Quote:
The sword had been polished, with little patina, so I etched it. It is forged, differentially hardened monosteel. I was hoping for hairpin, but it's still a nice piece. Dennee, thanks so much for your earlier thread on these swords. Steve |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greenville, NC
Posts: 1,854
|
![]()
Very attractive example and great work Steve.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 407
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Josh |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|