Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > European Armoury
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 7th April 2012, 05:14 PM   #7
cornelistromp
Member
 
cornelistromp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,060
Default

yes, I also think the mail fragment and brass tag are are probably not belonging together.
Gives this enough reason to declear the tag a fake?
The mail fragment could have been attached later by somebody, a collector or somebody else, as decoration for the tag.
it is a not a whole shirt what is attached, then it would have been a wrong composition!

In any case the party who is offering it now removed the fragment, he probably thought the same.

How were these marks attached to the mail, ​​as part of the mail with a riveted ring or sometimes also with separate brass rings ? I think I have seen both.

That the cast plate has been punched by hand, that I see as a more positive characteristic.
a 2 cm mark is probably too large to struck with a stamp.
Moreover, most of the brass mail rings are also cast and then afterwards punched, the same technique has been used here.
Further you also see some old traces of wear near the holes, it looks that the plate has been attached before.

I can not say for sure whether it is real but clearly a fake it is certainly not.

best,
cornelistromp is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.