![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 1,086
|
![]()
You have a very nice and fairly early wootz blade with a beautiful pattern. The yelman and long, almost spear-like point indicate an earlier blade. In my opinion, this blade could be 17th or 18th century. The blade profile seems to be wider at the hilt with good taper and if the blade has good heft/weight these would be other indications of an earlier blade. Of course, with the yelman, I would refer to this blade as a kilij. It is an earlier kilij form. I wouldn't worry about whether or not the grip slabs are original or not as the blade is the real treasure.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 1,340
|
![]()
Hey RSWORD, thanks!
Yes the blade is rather thick and has some good weight to it. Its very interesting that it could be that old. Is it common for such blades to have hardened edge? I wont be touching the hilt slabs then as I think the repair is an old one. But considering that Kuwait has lots of dust storms.. I may make a scabbard just for protection. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 1,086
|
![]()
Yes, you do find shamshir and kilij blades that were heat treated. When a blade is in new polish, this will often show up as a darker zone along the cutting edge, analogous to a hamon.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 1,340
|
![]()
Thanks alot for the information, RSWORD.
Does having a false edge classifies a blade as a kilij or does it have to be a raised false edge? Does the blade included on this post counts as a kilij? Last edited by A.alnakkas; 25th March 2012 at 07:09 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 936
|
![]()
I also like the blade and wootz pattern.
I agree with RSWORD that it's an earlier blade. My only comment is that I do not see it as "earliy kilij form", if by "early" one meant pre-18th Century. To me, this particular "yelman" looks more like a false edge, which could have been added/filed later. The "early" blades with yelmans of that form appear around 16th C, and this one does not look that old ![]() I'd not call both swords A.alnakkas shows as Kilijes. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 1,340
|
![]()
hey Alex,
excellent input. I have nothing more to add except that the shamshir's false edge is likely to be as early as the blade. The heat treatment also covers the false edge but could the heat treatment be done at a later time? Lotfy |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 936
|
![]()
Good observation, Lotfy. The heat treatment/hardening would not be made at a later time - highly unlikely without ruining wootz pattern. So better to accept the tempering is original, which is not as evident for the false edge. the question is: can heat treated edge be sharpened/reshaped at a later date while preserving the same color and contrast? I'd think the visually darker contrast would be throughout, not only surface based. so technically it can be. sorry for throwing it into the mix, as this is just a guess.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 1,340
|
![]() Quote:
Any idea where such a hilt might be used? Am thinking Syria but certain features are not there.. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 936
|
![]()
Lotfy, nice discussion - thank you. I agree about the false edge. It is likely of original design based on the heat treated pattern.
The hilt is not too specific to any particular region. It certainly could be Syrian, or any surrounding country:-) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 936
|
![]()
Here are some blades with similar "yelmans" (especially top two), attrubuted to 16, 17 and 18 Centuries. While the feature is similar, the taper, curvature and overall profile of Lotfy's blade is slightly different IMHO. As the difference of several centuries in evolution of the blade is not significant - I could be wrong:-)
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|