![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 131
|
![]()
I'm sorry, but this is pretty clearly a SEA blade from the last 1-200 years. It is a very nice blade. But not early, not middle eastern.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,060
|
![]() Quote:
it looks a little different though. Do you happen to have also examples of mandau blades with Naskhi inscription and magic squares that can be placed. thanks+regards |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 334
|
![]()
Another thing to take in consideration is the tang - stubby and somewhat downcurved, typical SE.
That last flachion has an awsome blade, I think the hilt is a later (yet old) refitting, maybe colonial dutch. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,060
|
![]() Quote:
further I have also seen a lot of SA origin with a twist (cork turner) in the tang. exactly a hit! Yes, I also think Dutch colonial probably Ceylon and later as the blade, if you look at the carved faces, they have an asian/oriental look. best, |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|