![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: CHRISTCHURCH NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 2,818
|
Subject to confirmation from others, I believe the first one is Thai. The second one is Yunnan I think.
Both nice pieces. Regards Stu (ex dha fanatic)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,378
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 865
|
Calling Mark B!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 865
|
I never get tired of seeing these! Thanks for sharing, Cerjak!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 865
|
Or Andrew W???
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 179
|
These are nice. Agree, Thai and Yunnan. I think the Thai sword has some good age too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 608
|
Am I looking at three different metals in the hilt, or different washes of the same metal?
![]() Nice dhas, both of them, IMO...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,725
|
Quote:
Second one is Northern Thai/Southern Yunnan, China. I have a very similar example in my collection, which can be seen here (#252): http://www.arscives.com/historysteel....swordlist.htm Both look like early-mid 20th century but, again, photos aren't great.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,725
|
A friend has gently pointed out to me off-list that I have made an error.
Here is what he sent me, and I agree--I was hasty in my analysis of that first sword. Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|