![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 140
|
![]()
Hi,
thank you for your answers. The size is 10 cm. I dont thougt of a keris hilt because i fount no example in the book of Zonnefeld. And here is a better photo. Thanks for your help best regards Dirk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,209
|
![]()
Definitely an ukiran.
You cann't find all ukirans in books. Books are limited in showing ukiran. The fantasy of carvers not. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 328
|
![]()
The general aspect of the hilt could bring to a betel crusher's hilt, but these have a somewhat square and smaller peg hole. This peg hole is no doubt that of a kris. Could be that a betel crusher's hilt has been adapted to fit a kris tang, widening the hole.
I happened to see betel crushers with kris hilt (planar type): the contrary cannot be excluded. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 140
|
![]()
Hi GIO,
Yes every thing is possible. BTW I got an example of a figural tool hilt in my collection as well. Here it is. It came with the hilt we have discussed allready. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 140
|
![]()
sorry,
length is 18 cm the whole tool and 8 cm only the hilt |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,165
|
![]() Quote:
This is a plocokan, a betel crusher, most proable from Lombok! ![]() Regards, Detlef |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|