![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,658
|
![]()
Hi Richmond,
thank you for the suggestion. Would you know if each inspector had his own 'number' specific to each individual person .....that was subsequently not used by anyone else ....ever. I'm just wondering whether some sort of dating could be discovered by checking inspector marks to their dates of employment ....obviously if the 'mark number' is 'transferrable' then it would be likely that several inspectors would have the same number and would make this more problematic. Best David |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|