![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,207
|
![]() Quote:
Thank you Jose for the first information! ![]() ![]() Now I am very very curious to get more informations about my new toy! Regards, Detlef |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 338
|
![]()
You've got a recently made Bicolano blade. Quality of these made today are about the same except that they now shellac the wood scabbards and the grind marks on the blades are more obvious/apparent on newer ones. I'm guessing yours is recent but not as recent as this, as in post WWII, but pre 1970's. Like Jose said, made in the same region as the Minasbad, but lacks the trademark shape and d-guard to be an actual Minasbad.
Older pieces have iron fittings instead of brass and the carvings are much smoother/rounder rather than angular. Interesting to note about this piece -- Bicol is located in the southern region of Luzon, almost the Visayas, so blades from this area have an amalgam of features from both regions. The figural hilts and blade shapes typically seen in Visayan blades are a feature used on many Bicolano blades, whereas the blade geometry is more similar to Luzon, in its double-beveled "lenticular" shape rather than the visayan single bevel. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,207
|
![]()
Hello Dave,
the seller told me that it is a bring-back from WWII but will contact him to get further informations. Regards, Detlef |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,207
|
![]()
And here a picture from the back of the sheath where is visible that the fittings are from iron.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Holland
Posts: 245
|
![]()
Hi Detlef ,
I don,t know noting about these swords but i realy like the blade form !! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,280
|
![]()
Thanks for the correction Pepperskull - I meant Bicol not Batangas (sleeping again at the 'puter
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 264
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,207
|
![]()
After some research in old threads I come across a picture posted from Zelbone in April 2006. The swords are labeled as Batangas Bolos. These two swords are very very similar in all parts, blade, handle and sheath.
So I hope that Zel see this thread and will be able to tell me/us more to the origin and estimated age. Regards, Detlef |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,280
|
![]()
Zel is no more a part of this forum (unfortunately) and I think later research said these were from Bicol. Need to double check with Lorenz.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,207
|
![]()
Jose is correct, it is a bolo from Bicol.
![]() Yesterday I have had contact with Zel by email and this is what he write me: As for your bolo, it's from Bicol...most likely the Rinconada area. As for age, it looks more modern...WWII and later. And furthermore: The type you have is I believed called a sinampalok....I don't have my notes with me right now. Sinampalok is term also used elsewhere in Luzon, but I've heard referred to this blade type in Bicol. I wouldn't get too hung up with the exact name of the blade type. There are hundreds of different blade types in the Philippines and the same blade can have different names even in the same region. What's important is that it's from Bicol...but it's not a minasbad. When you read this, thank you again Zel! ![]() But it will still be very intersting what Lorenz can tell us/me about this bolo. Regards, Detlef |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Manila, Phils.
Posts: 1,042
|
![]()
Sajen/ Battara, I agree with Zel - the sword is from the Bicol region of Luzon.
As to its name, I'm still figuring it out. In Marcos de Lisboa's [MDL] 1754 Spanish-Bicol dictionary, as cited in Mintz, we see these archaic Bicol terms for the Bicolanos' common swords: báˈid - (typ‑ knife, short, wide); MANG‑, PANG‑‑ON to cut s/t with a cutlass; MANG‑, PANG‑‑AN to cut s/t off from s/t with a cutlass [MDL] salabay - cutlass, used only in narratives and verse in place of báˈid (Note: salabay is listed only as part of the entry for báˈid and is not a separate entry in Lisboa) [MDL] káris - sword; MAG‑ to carry a sword; to duel; to fight with swords (two people); MA‑, ‑ON or MAG‑, PAG‑‑ON to wound s/o with a sword; to arm o/s with a sword; MA‑, ‑AN or MAG‑, PAG‑‑AN to arm s/o with a sword [MALAY keris] [MDL] sundáng - bolo, machete [MDL: a knife (general term); any instrument used for cutting; suró-sundáng small knife or one made from wood or bamboo] tabák - bolo, machete [MDL: knife (typ‑, also used as a weapon)] Am just guessing but if we are to speculate, it looks like baid fits the bill most closely -- short and wide knife. Thanks btw for posting the pics! Lorenz PS - The above was quoted from here. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|