Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 22nd January 2012, 01:34 AM   #5
sirupate
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: England
Posts: 373
Default

No Berkley I haven't, this particular section was dealing with equipment supplied and must be read in that context, as Uniform is dealt with in another couple of paragraph's.

Also below;
GENERAL ORDERS BY THE HONOURABLE THE GOVERNOR IN COUNCIL Fort William, 2nd May 1823.
these corps (The Nasiri & Sirmoor) are clothed, armed, equipt and supplied with Ammunition at the expense of the State....etc.

I would also like to point out that Berkley is a moderator on International Kukri Research and Historical Society (IKRHS), where Spiral was made Senior Researcher, so there may be bias in the way he answers, it is interesting to note, that he questioned myself, but not what or why Spiral quoted the way he did?

Last edited by sirupate; 22nd January 2012 at 03:11 PM. Reason: Point of potential interest
sirupate is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.