Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 12th August 2005, 09:12 PM   #1
Mark
Member
 
Mark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 987
Thumbs up

Good stuff! I have read excerpts of Fitch's journal in a couple books, but I only just scored (today) a copy of the full work. I hope that it arrives soon. I don't know if it is the edition you mention -- the footnotes seem interesting in yours.

I also have come across extracts of the travel journal of a Portuese from the same period (his name escapes me, but I'll add it later when I have my notebook at hand [LATER: Sebastien Manrique, who travelled in Arrakan between 1630 and 1635, and so was not really a contemporary of Fytche after all]), and he describes a procession during a royal coronation in Arakan in which there were several squadrons of cavalry of various nationalities, some of which carried "swords," and others of which carried "sabers" (these last were Mogul mercenaries). The Burmese were described as carrying spears, but not swords, which I found very interesting. It might have been due to the fact that they were horsemen, not infantry. [Arakan is on the coast on the west side of the Malay penninsula, and is now part of Myanmar. It was usually dominated to varying degrees by the Burmese Empire -- this guy happened to visit during one of the periods of independence]

The dha is indeed central to Kachin life. It is even used as a ritual medium of debt payment, and is in those cases often not even a functional dha or full size. It is the idea of the value of the dha that drives the transaction. They are also stuck up in the rafters of a house near the household shrine (sometimes in miniature form). A stair of swords, edge up (actually wood, apparently) was at least at one time used during the initation of monks in Burma.

LATER: There are excerpts from a number of European traveller's journals in a book called "Old Burma, as described by Early Foreign Travellers" by U Myo Min (Hanthawaddy Pub., 1947). This is where I read Manrique's account, and a bit of Fytche.

With all this information about how important the dha was, I find it really odd and frustrating that there are not more references to them, and more descriptions of the darn things, or depictions in art. Aggrevating.

Last edited by Mark Bowditch; 15th August 2005 at 02:36 AM. Reason: adding more information ....
Mark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th August 2005, 07:12 PM   #2
B.I
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 485
Default

hi mark,
i really look forward to hearing more details of his travels. from what i read, it seemed even a casual mention is of great importance, as it is a period of very little information. these early travellers were essential in our knowledge of early cultures. it is more from them, than from the actual peoples that information will be found, as they were outsiders and anything 'strange' would have been fully described (you'd hope).
i have never understood the exclusion of weapons we knew existed in iconograpgy, whether painting or scuplture. the same goes for koras in nepal etc.
according to some outspoken opinions, without this 'photographic' evidence, your dha cant have existed anyway, so maybe there are a figment of your imagination
the book i read included other travellers of the same period, all english. i do have the name of a portuguese traveller that left records at the same period. i have yet to chase this down, but i wonder if he is the same guy you mention. i hope there is more to finch than i have read, as he sounds a fascinating man. he travelled more in the 16thC, than the majority do now. from what i read of his and others accounts, i am not surprised of the influences that spread over such wide expanses. each port was filled with portuguese, moors, english, french as well as all parts of the east. trade was flourishing and almost the mainstay of income for many countries.
do examples of 16th/17thC dha exist?
B.I is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th August 2005, 04:38 AM   #3
Andrew
Member
 
Andrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,725
Default

Brian, I'll gleefully accept your generous offer! I'll send you an email to iron out the details.

Quote:
Originally Posted by B.I
do examples of 16th/17thC dha exist?
I think so. I'm confident this sword (and a very similar one owned by Mark) are Ayutthaya period Siam (14th - 18th c.). I'm traveling and my internet connection is spotty. When I return, I'll try to dig up the powerpoint presentation I put together on this sword for Timonium, 2004. (For those that have seen this many times before, I apologize ).

Andrew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th August 2005, 03:31 PM   #4
Mark
Member
 
Mark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 987
Default

This is my Ayutthaya-era dha. The Ayutthaya Period ran from 1350 to 1767, but we are pretty sure that these are from the mid-Ayutthaya Period, i.e., 16th-early 17th C. AD at the oldest. I say 18th C. on my website, but we've since gotten information from one of the early owners of the blades that pushes the date further back.



The whole page on it is here.
Mark is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.