![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Sharp end
Posts: 2,928
|
![]() Quote:
I assume the numbers are the spine numbers and the collector seems to have researched each one and assigned it to it's original owner. These spine numbers are deeply stamped into the spine up near the guard. There would be no easy way to grind them out or fill them short of careful electric welding, repolishing/renumbering them over the top. I would think that these numbers will prove too difficult to remove and be the best hope of recovery. What an amazing collection. I'd be heartbroken to have lost it if it were mine. Well done for spreading the word. The more people aware the greater the chance of recovery. Best Gene |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
|
![]()
Fascinating stuff this!
Any of the collectors here heard of any of these stolen pieces yet? Or have they disapeered into a "secret" collection somewhere? Because someone could get them cheaper than legal pieces? As they say in Devon "Bargain" ![]() Lots more swords stolen worlwide lately, A Japanese shop just lost yen 15,000,000 worth of katana. Loads of recent thieving in England & California to. linky 1 for example Who buys all these stolen swords? Do they ever show them to anyone else? What happens to them? Dont reckon there weighed in for scrap, they must end up with knowledgable collecters eventualy... I wonder if it adds to the pleasure of owning them or dimineshes it? ![]() Spiral |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Sharp end
Posts: 2,928
|
![]()
Hi J,
I don't know. I guess with the top list in this thread it's going to be pretty difficult for them to be broken up and sold separately as they are all individually recorded. They should start to be picked up as they trickle onto the market. As long as the serial numbers etc aren't removed ![]() If you google any of the names and numbers it should bring up one of the sites showing the list of stolen swords. As for the ones in your link, well that's definately going to be more problematic. It's a worry on several levels for sure. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|