Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 25th November 2011, 07:55 PM   #1
kahnjar1
Member
 
kahnjar1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: CHRISTCHURCH NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 2,789
Default

Salaams Ibrahiim.

Thank you for that information. We must of course bow to the (better) knowledge from establishments in the "country of origin".
No doubt in collectors circles the name KATTARA will continue to be used to describe the straight Omani sword, as perhaps the term "Wahabite" is often used to describe the Dharia daggers of Western Arabia.

Perhaps with all the information now assembled, it could be worth writing a small book on the subject, which could be made available at a reasonable price to those interested. Certainly with the wealth of writing on this subject, which has appeared on the Forum, it would maybe only take some editing to get things into a publishable form??

If such a book were to appear, I for one would certainly buy a copy.

Regards Stu
kahnjar1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th November 2011, 01:04 AM   #2
Jim McDougall
Arms Historian
 
Jim McDougall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,292
Default

This is absolutely excellent work Ibrahiim, and your tenacious field research is moving in an astoundingly compelling direction in resolving the terminology issues pertaining to these particular swords.
There are many dilemmas concerning terms used to identify and classify many ethnographic weapons, and it is good to see at least this area being addressed. It seems there are well supported details here which offer good reason to recognize the term application.....but as we have found over the years, quite another story to realign terms used by collectors and even in most cases scholars.
Many terms have become thoroughly established semantically in the literature, and as a result the corrected term can often lead to difficulty in interpretation in discussions and subsequent material.

This does not by any means diminish the importance of the resolution in correcting the terms, and hopefully further work will reflect as per the realigned terms.

I think case in point are the katar, which should be called the jamadhar; the kaskara, which is actually known simply as sa'if locally, as are many swords in the Dar al Islam, where the term sa'if is applied in general to various sword forms. In Morocco, the sabre which has been mistermed 'nimcha' as typically known as a sa'if. I think these are more cases of transliteration, but again, have become so firmly established it will be difficult to realign.

Excellent work Ibrahiim!! and absolutely must be continued!!!

All the best,
Jim
Jim McDougall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th November 2011, 05:32 PM   #3
Ibrahiim al Balooshi
Member
 
Ibrahiim al Balooshi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Buraimi Oman, on the border with the UAE
Posts: 4,408
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim McDougall
This is absolutely excellent work Ibrahiim, and your tenacious field research is moving in an astoundingly compelling direction in resolving the terminology issues pertaining to these particular swords.
There are many dilemmas concerning terms used to identify and classify many ethnographic weapons, and it is good to see at least this area being addressed. It seems there are well supported details here which offer good reason to recognize the term application.....but as we have found over the years, quite another story to realign terms used by collectors and even in most cases scholars.
Many terms have become thoroughly established semantically in the literature, and as a result the corrected term can often lead to difficulty in interpretation in discussions and subsequent material.

This does not by any means diminish the importance of the resolution in correcting the terms, and hopefully further work will reflect as per the realigned terms.

I think case in point are the katar, which should be called the jamadhar; the kaskara, which is actually known simply as sa'if locally, as are many swords in the Dar al Islam, where the term sa'if is applied in general to various sword forms. In Morocco, the sabre which has been mistermed 'nimcha' as typically known as a sa'if. I think these are more cases of transliteration, but again, have become so firmly established it will be difficult to realign.

Excellent work Ibrahiim!! and absolutely must be continued!!!

All the best,
Jim

Salaams Jim, Thank you for the kind words. Constructive criticism; I love it ! Going forward using the data so far extracted I think we have a good chance to put some perspective around this entire connundrum on Omani Swords. I hope we can bring some of the viewers on board to actively contribute and other already Forum members who havent written in...can be encouraged to dig up the references or carry out some web searching so we can engage everyone in discussion. It must have been shocking in the early days before computers! A letter in 1811 to India from Muscat would take a few weeks to arrive and twice as long to come back. Regards Ibrahiim al Balooshi.
Ibrahiim al Balooshi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th November 2011, 01:08 AM   #4
Jim McDougall
Arms Historian
 
Jim McDougall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,292
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kahnjar1
Salaams Ibrahiim.

Thank you for that information. We must of course bow to the (better) knowledge from establishments in the "country of origin".
No doubt in collectors circles the name KATTARA will continue to be used to describe the straight Omani sword, as perhaps the term "Wahabite" is often used to describe the Dharia daggers of Western Arabia.

Perhaps with all the information now assembled, it could be worth writing a small book on the subject, which could be made available at a reasonable price to those interested. Certainly with the wealth of writing on this subject, which has appeared on the Forum, it would maybe only take some editing to get things into a publishable form??

If such a book were to appear, I for one would certainly buy a copy.

Regards Stu

Excellent points Stu!!! and I totally agree! a monograph with these kinds of details would be much appreciated in the arms world, and there is indeed a wealth of knowledge and material shared here. I'd be right with ya in line!

All the best,
Jim
Jim McDougall is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.