![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Coast USA
Posts: 3,191
|
![]()
Here are the other two pics from the duplicate thread.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,295
|
![]()
Thanks very much for sharing the native applied lion and cross and orb. It would be great to know more on the Islamic script added, which seems atypical on these post Mahdiyya kaskara. Hopefully Stephen might observe.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Olomouc
Posts: 1,717
|
![]()
Looking again I'd have to say I agree Jim, certainly locally applied marks. Still wonder why the fly is missing... Odd. I still would say the blade has a good chance to be European, don't normally see a ricasso on a native blade.
Also hope Stephen can chime in here, he's seen far more of these swords than most of us! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,295
|
![]() Quote:
Where's Ed!!!????? All the best, Jim |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Nashville
Posts: 317
|
![]()
The writing on this is beautiful, and done masterfully. Some one took long, painfull hours to inscibe them on the blade.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: dc
Posts: 271
|
![]()
It is beautiful writing. It must have been some sort of reverse or negative of the typical acid etching you see on the typical kaskara.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 415
|
![]()
Colin,
Great sword!!! My knowledge is limited, but may add another ingredient to the stew. My guess is it isn't from Kassala based mainly on the handle wrap. The blade looks thick in the photograph. Hasn't been sharpened in years. Probably old. Grip it with the blade pointing up and snap your wrist. If the blade vibrates for a few seconds, it may be made from lorry spring stock. Likewise, does it bend / deflect maybe 15 degrees or more? Some of the modern Kassala blades could almost bend double for someone who was skilled at the demonstration. The calligraphy is very stylistic. Not the style of a suq al haddad worker, maybe a silver smith. No doubt the translation may put into a context. Is it engraved or more likely etched? Modern (1986 is the limit of my personal experience with the sword smiths.) marks are often just scratches into the blade or made with a crude punch. The lion is stylistically sophisticated, and may be the calligrapher's mark rather than that of the blade maker. No opinion on the orb and cross. Line width is more narrow that the calligraphy and that may have meaning. Is it the same depth? I'll be eager to learn more about this outstanding item. Regards, Ed |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|