![]() |
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
Hello Roy,
I agree with the others that this obviously an above average datu piece displaying great Sulu craftmanship. I'm not sure it's older than, say, turn of the century though: Does it have a seperate katik? (Is it the line ending at the upper asang-asang? An odd position - if tough to tell, the laminations will reveal more after staining.) Regards, Kai |
|
|
|
|
|