Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 21st September 2011, 08:13 AM   #1
kai
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
Default

Hello Charles,

Quote:
Any symbolic significance to the brass inlays that anyone can think of??
This blade doesn't look antique to me - maybe more like before WW2? While the dots may still have had some meaning in Malay culture, I wouldn't discount the possibility that they were just added because they are seen in some Moro kris, too...

Regards,
Kai
kai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st September 2011, 12:34 PM   #2
CharlesS
Member
 
CharlesS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greenville, NC
Posts: 1,854
Default

Kai,

I am just curious; what about this blade does not look "antique"? Were it a Moro blade I think it would be much easier to "date", but I am not as familiar with Malay blades.

Could you please post some comparative examples for contrast and study?
CharlesS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st September 2011, 04:12 PM   #3
mross
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 478
Default

Looks cool very unique, I like it.
mross is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st September 2011, 06:12 PM   #4
Spunjer
Member
 
Spunjer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Witness Protection Program
Posts: 1,730
Default

Nice one, my friend! Does it have a twisty core?
Spunjer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st September 2011, 06:38 PM   #5
Gustav
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,280
Default

The engravings on hilt look like a chinese work, compare it to pendok on second keris here: http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...=chinese+keris

Is there a possibility, such (triangular) configuration of fullers on base of blade is more sumatran then malay? Have seen such on two sumatran dreesed keris blades.
Gustav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd September 2011, 01:07 PM   #6
CharlesS
Member
 
CharlesS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greenville, NC
Posts: 1,854
Default

Sorry, no twistcore blade Spunjer!
CharlesS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd September 2011, 11:28 PM   #7
Battara
EAAF Staff
 
Battara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,280
Default

Hate to say but the chasing work on the hilt is common okir style to the region. Maybe a Chinese silversmith made it, maybe not.
Battara is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th September 2011, 09:12 AM   #8
kai
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
Default

Hello Gustav,

Quote:
Is there a possibility, such (triangular) configuration of fullers on base of blade is more sumatran then malay? Have seen such on two sumatran dreesed keris blades.
Which keris are you thinking of? Could you please post pics? TIA!

Regards,
Kai
kai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th September 2011, 12:24 PM   #9
Gustav
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,280
Default

Hello Kai,

unfortunately I don't have any pictures of these Keris. Both have had similar triangular fullers at the base, combined with elongated srawejan/kruwingan, and both Sumatran (Riau) sheaths.

You are of course wright about the Sundang I posted, the similarity is only very superficial, just this glimpse of disappeared sogokan. Here a pic of another Sundang, which is probably similar to the one in Museum.

As I wrote, I suppose, the sundang of Charles has lost some material abowe the Greneng; the space between fuller and edge should be equally broad as on the Kembang Kacang side. I think, there is some minimal markings of reshaping also abowe the (actually much to small and Moro looking) Kembang Kacang, and this space (Gusen) could originally be broader also on this side.

Sorry for the inappropriate Javanese terminology to describe the features!

I suppose also, there were some "extern" Greneng beyond the inserted dots, which is almost completely gone. As ever, the most loss of material is at the Wadidang/Greneng area. Becouse of this very common reshaping I thought, this Sundang could be slightly older (end of 19. cent.), yet your observation about angular Tungkakan is very good. I really don't know.
Attached Images
  

Last edited by Gustav; 30th September 2011 at 12:53 PM.
Gustav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th September 2011, 08:51 AM   #10
kai
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
Default

Hello Charles,

Sorry for the late reply!


Quote:
I am just curious; what about this blade does not look "antique"? Were it a Moro blade I think it would be much easier to "date", but I am not as familiar with Malay blades.
If this were a Moro blade, the strongly angular separation line would most likely place it in the 1920-1930 period. Thus, it seems unlikely to me that (despite their obvious creativity) any Malay bladesmith made this earlier.

Your blade looks nice (with workmanship of better quality than most Moro kris of that period) but lacks the crispness and flow I'd expect from a 19th century kris (of good quality); some details like the greneng and the jalen as well as the pretty homogenous metal and the stained wood pommel seem to support a 1920-1940 period for its origin. Wait a decade or two and I won't quibble with it being antique anymore...

Regards,
Kai
kai is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.