![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
Hello Charles,
Quote:
Regards, Kai |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greenville, NC
Posts: 1,854
|
![]()
Kai,
I am just curious; what about this blade does not look "antique"? Were it a Moro blade I think it would be much easier to "date", but I am not as familiar with Malay blades. Could you please post some comparative examples for contrast and study? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 478
|
![]()
Looks cool very unique, I like it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Witness Protection Program
Posts: 1,730
|
![]()
Nice one, my friend! Does it have a twisty core?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,280
|
![]()
The engravings on hilt look like a chinese work, compare it to pendok on second keris here: http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...=chinese+keris
Is there a possibility, such (triangular) configuration of fullers on base of blade is more sumatran then malay? Have seen such on two sumatran dreesed keris blades. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greenville, NC
Posts: 1,854
|
![]()
Sorry, no twistcore blade Spunjer!
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,280
|
![]()
Hate to say but the chasing work on the hilt is common okir style to the region. Maybe a Chinese silversmith made it, maybe not.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
Hello Gustav,
Quote:
Regards, Kai |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,280
|
![]()
Hello Kai,
unfortunately I don't have any pictures of these Keris. Both have had similar triangular fullers at the base, combined with elongated srawejan/kruwingan, and both Sumatran (Riau) sheaths. You are of course wright about the Sundang I posted, the similarity is only very superficial, just this glimpse of disappeared sogokan. Here a pic of another Sundang, which is probably similar to the one in Museum. As I wrote, I suppose, the sundang of Charles has lost some material abowe the Greneng; the space between fuller and edge should be equally broad as on the Kembang Kacang side. I think, there is some minimal markings of reshaping also abowe the (actually much to small and Moro looking) Kembang Kacang, and this space (Gusen) could originally be broader also on this side. Sorry for the inappropriate Javanese terminology to describe the features! I suppose also, there were some "extern" Greneng beyond the inserted dots, which is almost completely gone. As ever, the most loss of material is at the Wadidang/Greneng area. Becouse of this very common reshaping I thought, this Sundang could be slightly older (end of 19. cent.), yet your observation about angular Tungkakan is very good. I really don't know. Last edited by Gustav; 30th September 2011 at 12:53 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
Hello Charles,
Sorry for the late reply! Quote:
Your blade looks nice (with workmanship of better quality than most Moro kris of that period) but lacks the crispness and flow I'd expect from a 19th century kris (of good quality); some details like the greneng and the jalen as well as the pretty homogenous metal and the stained wood pommel seem to support a 1920-1940 period for its origin. Wait a decade or two and I won't quibble with it being antique anymore... ![]() Regards, Kai |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|