![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,194
|
![]()
Thank you Michael and Gio, nicely explained. It seems that most of the references I found pertaining to the wavy edges do not consider any notable advantage to the presumed increased cutting surface of this feature. It is noted that the forging and maintainance of these blades would be more involved, thus it does seem a feature 'for effect' in dramatic presence rather than use. It is interesting that artistic license seems to place these wavy blade types with Landsknechts in many instances. It is also interesting that the vestigial parrying hooks remain present on these non combative bearing swords.
The use of the heavy two handers in combat as noted to destroy long pikes seems understandably effective but I am unsure how the equally large claymores in Scotland were used in thier type of warfare. All the best, Jim |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bavaria, Germany - the center of 15th and 16th century gunmaking
Posts: 4,310
|
![]()
Hi Jim,
Though this is not my main field of expertise, I would surmise that the beautiful Scottish Claymores had much the same purpose as their continental alikes. http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...light=claymore As to the notably heavy weight of these early two hand swords we should remember that the Doppelsöldner Landsknechts who wielded them had extensive exercise in effectively managing those monsters that surprise us with their weight today. And they accordingly received double pay. Best, Michael |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,194
|
![]() Quote:
Thank you so much Michael for the replies, and indeed it seems these guys had to get some serious practice to use these huge swords. According to studies by John Clements, these were not as heavy as often thought though. In a compilation of notes on some 69 of the two handers in Graz, they ranged in weight from about 3 lbs (the lightest) to around between 5-7 lbs. with the heaviest about 13 lbs. Most of that weight seem to have been as noted, bearing or processional swords. While largely obsolete by end of the 16th century, it seems the Scots did carry them in some degree through the 17th, with even some reports of them as late as Culloden (1746). We know of course that like the landsknechts, the Scots were mercenaries, and brought numbers of these back from their campaigns on the Continent. Clements notes there are no real recorded guides to the actual method of use of these in combat, but for the references to using them among pike squares and to disable halberds and other polearms. I would suspect that with the Scots these may have been useful in clearing openings in melee in a sense, and these would literally mow down opponents en masse. The English termed them 'slaughter swords'. I couldnt resist an illustration of a MacDougall clansman with one ![]() ![]() All the best, Jim |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bavaria, Germany - the center of 15th and 16th century gunmaking
Posts: 4,310
|
![]()
Hi Jim,
I would love to hoist a Drambuie to you and your clansman but I have none. Will a 16 yo Lagavulin do? ![]() ![]() ![]() Best, Michael |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
(deceased)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bavaria, Germany - the center of 15th and 16th century gunmaking
Posts: 4,310
|
![]() Quote:
Hi Jim, You are absolutely right, of course: the wavy blades characteristically correspond to the early Renaissance artistic taste, and it is interesting indeed that they should mostly occur on late Renaissance types. The parrying hooks on those late big swords seem nothing more but a stylistic reminiscence of their practical use half a century before. Best, Michael Last edited by Matchlock; 23rd July 2011 at 10:45 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|