![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Manila, Phils.
Posts: 1,042
|
![]()
For the technically-inclined:
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Manila, Phils.
Posts: 1,042
|
![]()
Incidentally, the dissertation covered 75 pieces from the Guthe-Michigan collection, plus another 10 artifacts from the Phil. national museum.
As to the basis of the age of the artifacts, I've just leafed through the paper (it's about 500 pages long). The 10th to 15th century dating can be found in the excerpt below. I suppose they also used the associated Chinese ceramics excavated together with the metal artifacts. These Chinese ceramics provide a pretty accurate metric, and are used all the time ("Nacho" is an expert on this also). |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Manila, Phils.
Posts: 1,042
|
![]()
There's an artifact from Bohol in the Visayas which was initially thought to be a kris. But Dr. Dizon correctly pointed out in his paper that it is a spear:
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Manila, Phils.
Posts: 1,042
|
![]()
Now I'm not an expert on Philippine krises, much more on Indonesian and Malaysian kerises
![]() Thus the above info are being presented for purposes of validating and further examining things. I realize that the 10th to 15th century dating of the Visayan kris will impinge upon the commonly held view that the keris/kris came from Java. And the images found in Candi Sukuh (pics below, from Wikipedia), are supposedly one of the best proofs. Again, you guys are the expert ![]() On the other hand, what's the meaning of life if we don't reexamine our beliefs from time to time? ![]() I've discussed the matter briefly with "Nacho" earlier. Off hand, he thinks that one explanation is that the Philippine kris and the Indonesian keris had a parallel development. I think that's one very plausible view (instead of pitting one against the other, as to which came first). We'd certainly like to hear more views and queries on the matter. To broaden the perspective, I'll also be posting pics of even older blade hilts, from a recently published book on Philippine ancestral gold (10th to 13th century). |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,018
|
![]()
Very interesting.
Thank you for posting the articles/information. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Manila, Phils.
Posts: 1,042
|
![]()
Kino, thanks
![]() Here's the continuation. Below are pics of Philippine gold hilts from the 10th to the 13th century. A little later, I'll post the comments of the southeast Asia expert from the Metropolitan Museum (NY) on these artifacts. Kindly note that one of the hilts show the bird beak/ elephant trunk motif. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Manila, Phils.
Posts: 1,042
|
![]()
In the same book (Philippine Ancestral Gold), the artifacts from Java and Philippines were compared from time to time, like below.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|