![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,658
|
![]()
I too would see this as a Kilij ....perhaps originally the yelman was more prenounced and this area re-worked to suit an individuals taste
![]() Nice piece Gav. Regards David |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Sharp end
Posts: 2,928
|
![]()
It's a beauty Gav!!
Are you going to do anything to the blade? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,818
|
![]()
Hi David,
Anything is possible with re-profiling but I think not looking at the flow of the blade from the hilt. A grip strap is currently unsecured and the blade from within the hilt all flows perfectly through to the tip. I was lucky enough to recieve mail on the subject of this Kilij. The content points out with a provenanced example, that blades of this slimmer form were know as early as 1600...still lots to dig through....The Tughra marking ID will be most interesting and it prompts me to find the USB microscopes previously recommended but not actioned... I'll try the camera this weekend to see if that helps first... Gene, My intentions are to pass this on to Philip for a complete and proper polish and have a few other loose ends looked at too...however I am walking a very fine line at present with purchases such as this (and others) and keeping you know who happy at the same time....man what a task!!!! Why walk on thin ice when you can dance...that's my motto!!!! Gav |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 936
|
![]() Quote:
Here is an "official" description: THE OTTOMAN SILVER-MOUNTED SHAMSHIR PRESENTED TO CAPTAIN COLIN MACKAY OF BIGHOUSE BY MOHAMMED ALI PASHA OF EGYPT IN 1807 FOLLOWING HIS COMMAND OF THE GRENADIER COMPANY OF THE 2ND BATTALION OF THE 78TH REGIMENT OF FOOT AT EL HAMET IN 1807 ... Calling these blades Shamshir or Kilij is a matter of personal taste, and dating/naming them based on the presence of yelman alone... not that easy. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,818
|
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() I have seen many of these subtle yelman kilij dated from the ealry 1600s through to the early 1900s. One in particular carrying very good provenance from the early 1600s. It is unfortunate that the provenance in the example presented only carries weight as so far as the date of gifting, not manufacture. There are even similar looking blades dating to the second half of the 16th century that carry 19th century fittings...... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Houston, TX, USA
Posts: 1,254
|
![]()
More than anything else the blade style reminds me of 18th/early19th shah shish qa blades, (sha'sh'qa) particularly those associated to Afghanistan.
Consider that the usual kilich blade has two gently curved sections with an abrupt bend around about the middle and is wider than this, while the shamshir is a parabolic curve that gets more and more curved toward the tip. This blade has a relatively circular curve and the shape of the yelman reminds me of the Afghan swords I mentioned, as well. Last edited by tom hyle; 12th June 2011 at 05:12 AM. Reason: typo |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |||
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,818
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Quote:
![]() Quote:
Gav |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|