![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 536
|
![]()
Battara,
Could you tell me what "sipput" means and if my long barong fits in that category? The blade is 22 1/16" with a false back edge of 15 1/8". The blade is not very robust, being only 2 3/8" at its deepest point with a 3/16" spine at the hilt. The blade is also very springy so I assume it's made of spring steel like a machete. It appears that the sheath had mop inlays. It is currently being held together with paper wrapping and twist ties because three of the four wood pins that held the two halves together are missing. There is an an inletted design filled with what appears to be tar (gal gal?) at the top of the scabbard. There is also a series of round holes at the top and chape that appear to be filled with the same material. The hilt is rather sad. It looks like it was made from an old wooden walking stick handle that was jammed into a ferrule made of some sort of brass machine part. Does anyone know where I can get a modern reproduction barong hilt for a modest cost? Sincerely, RobT |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 55
|
![]()
its not a "barung" but its related.... and that's all i will comment..
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,272
|
![]()
As far as what "sipput" means.....I don't know nor do I know the etomology of that word (at present). However Ibeam told me he got the term from Cecil Qirino at Kris Cutlery. I do know that the barong sipput I sold Ibeam also had a springy blade, as thin, narrow, and long. I personally favor the earlier versions of the barong, which tend to be shorter, wider, and more likely to be laminated steel.
RobT, if your example is a barong sipput, it would fit the description above and my personal observation is that they are a later evolution of the barong, going well into the 20th century. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|